Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSamulowitz, Anke
dc.contributor.authorHaukenes, Inger
dc.contributor.authorGrimby-Ekman, Anna
dc.contributor.authorBergman, Stefan
dc.contributor.authorHensing, Gunnel
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-05T09:13:26Z
dc.date.available2023-09-05T09:13:26Z
dc.date.created2023-06-19T10:39:53Z
dc.date.issued2023-03-17
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3087430
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Psychosocial resources, psychological and social factors like self-efficacy and social support have been suggested as important assets for individuals with chronic pain, but the importance of psychosocial resources for the development of pain is sparsely examined, especially sex and gender differences. The aim of this study was to investigate associations between psychosocial resources and sex on the development of frequent pain in a general population sample, and to deepen the knowledge about sex and gender patterns. Methods: A sample from the Swedish Health Assets Project, a longitudinal cohort study, included self-reported data from 2263 participants, 53% women, with no frequent pain at baseline. The outcome variable was frequent pain at 18–months follow-up. Psychosocial resources studied were general self-efficacy, instrumental and emotional social support. Log binomial regressions in a generalised linear model were used to calculate risk ratios (RRs), comparing all combinations of men with high psychosocial resources, men with low psychosocial resources, women with high psychosocial resources and women with low psychosocial resources. Results: Women with low psychosocial resources had higher risk of frequent pain at follow-up compared to men with high resources: general self-efficacy RR 1.82, instrumental social support RR 2.33 and emotional social support RR 1.94. Instrumental social support was the most important protective resource for women, emotional social support was the most important one for men. Results were discussed in terms of gender norms. Conclusions: The psychosocial resources general self-efficacy, instrumental and emotional support predicted the risk of developing frequent pain differently among and between men and women in a general population sample. The results showed the importance of studying sex and gender differences in psychological and not least social predictors for pain.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherPLoSen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titlePsychosocial resources predict frequent pain differently for men and women: A prospective cohort studyen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2023 the authorsen_US
dc.source.articlenumbere0283222en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0283222
dc.identifier.cristin2155702
dc.source.journalPLOS ONEen_US
dc.identifier.citationPLOS ONE. 2023, 18 (3), e0283222.en_US
dc.source.volume18en_US
dc.source.issue3en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal