Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorBeresniewicz, Justyna
dc.contributor.authorRiemer, Frank
dc.contributor.authorKazimierczak, Katarzyna Anna
dc.contributor.authorErsland, Lars
dc.contributor.authorCraven, Alexander R.
dc.contributor.authorHugdahl, Kenneth Jan
dc.contributor.authorGrüner, Renate
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-14T11:09:49Z
dc.date.available2023-09-14T11:09:49Z
dc.date.created2023-09-04T14:30:13Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.issn1662-5161
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3089429
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) block-design experiments typically include active ON-blocks with presentation of cognitive tasks which are contrasted with OFF- blocks with no tasks presented. OFF-blocks in between ON-blocks can however, also be seen as a proxy for intermittent periods of resting, inducing temporary resting-states. We still do not know if brain activity during such intermittent periods reflects the same kind of resting-state activity as that obtained during a continuous period, as is typically the case in studies of the classic Default Mode Network (DMN). The purpose of the current study was therefore to investigate both similarities and differences in brain activity between intermittent and continuous resting conditions. Methods: There were 47 healthy participants in the 3T fMRI experiment. Data for the intermittent resting-state condition were acquired from resting-periods in between active task-processing periods in a standard ON-OFF block design, with three different cognitive tasks presented during ON-blocks. Data for the continuous resting-state condition were acquired during a 5 min resting period after the task-design had been presented. Results and discussion: The results showed that activity was overall similar in the two conditions, but with some differences. These differences were within the DMN network, and for the interaction of DMN with other brain networks. DMN maps showed weak overlap between conditions in the medial prefrontal cortex (MPFC), and in particular for the intermittent compared to the continuous resting-state condition. Moreover, DMN showed strong connectivity with the salience network (SN) in the intermittent resting-state condition, particularly in the anterior insula and the supramarginal gyrus. The observed differences may reflect a “carry-over” effect from task-processing to the next resting-state period, not present in the continuous resting-state condition, causing interference from the ON-blocks. Further research is needed to fully understand the extent of differences between intermittent and continuous resting-state conditions.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherFrontiersen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleSimilarities and differences between intermittent and continuous resting-state fMRIen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2023 The Author(s)en_US
dc.source.articlenumber1238888en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/fnhum.2023.1238888
dc.identifier.cristin2172167
dc.source.journalFrontiers in Human Neuroscienceen_US
dc.identifier.citationFrontiers in Human Neuroscience. 2023, 17, 1238888.en_US
dc.source.volume17en_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal