Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorSkjellerudsveen, Berit Mære
dc.contributor.authorSkoie, Inger Marie
dc.contributor.authorDalen, Ingvild
dc.contributor.authorGrimstad, Tore Bjørn
dc.contributor.authorOmdal, Roald
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-05T12:18:03Z
dc.date.available2023-10-05T12:18:03Z
dc.date.created2023-06-14T16:07:01Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.issn0012-6667
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3094506
dc.description.abstractBackground: Fatigue is a frequent complaint in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Biological drugs have demonstrated beneficial effects on some extraintestinal manifestations, but the effect on fatigue is not clear. Objective: This study investigated the effects of biological and small molecule drugs approved for inflammatory bowel disease on fatigue. Methods: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, placebo-controlled trials reporting Federal Drug Agency (FDA)-approved biological and small molecule drugs for use in ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease in which measures of fatigue were recorded before and after treatment. Only induction studies were included. Maintenance studies were excluded. We searched Embase (Ovid), Medline (Ovid), PsycINFO (Ovid), Cinahl (EBSCOhost), Web of Science Core Collection, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and ClinicalTrials.gov in May 2022. Risk of bias was analyzed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. Standardized mean difference was used to measure the treatment effect. Results: A total of seven randomized controlled trials composed of 3835 patients were included in the meta-analysis. All of the studies included patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis or Crohn’s disease. The studies used three different generic fatigue instruments: the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue and the Short Form 36 Health Survey Vitality Subscale versions 1 and 2. Overall treatment with biological or small molecule agents showed a beneficial effect compared with placebo, with a standardized mean difference of 0.25 (95% confidence interval 0.15–0.34, p < 0.001). The effect was independent of type of drug or subtype of inflammatory bowel disease. Discussion: The risk of bias was considered to be low for all domains except for missing outcome data. Even though the included studies were of high methodological quality, the review is limited by the small number of studies included and that the available studies were not designed to evaluate fatigue specifically. Conclusion: Biological and small molecule drugs used in inflammatory bowel disease have a consistent, though small, beneficial effect on fatigue.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse-Ikkekommersiell 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleThe Effect of Biological Treatment on Fatigue in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysisen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2023 the authorsen_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s40265-023-01888-3
dc.identifier.cristin2154575
dc.source.journalDrugsen_US
dc.source.pagenumber909-921en_US
dc.identifier.citationDrugs. 2023, 83, 909-921.en_US
dc.source.volume83en_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse-Ikkekommersiell 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse-Ikkekommersiell 4.0 Internasjonal