Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorGaydarska, Bisserka
dc.contributor.authorRebay-Salisbury, Katharina
dc.contributor.authorRamírez Valiente, Paz
dc.contributor.authorFries, Jana Esther
dc.contributor.authorHofmann, Daniela
dc.contributor.authorAugereau, Anne
dc.contributor.authorChapman, John
dc.contributor.authorMina, Maria
dc.contributor.authorPape, Eleonore
dc.contributor.authorIalongo, Nicola
dc.contributor.authorNordholz, Daniela
dc.contributor.authorBickle, Penny
dc.contributor.authorHaughton, Mark
dc.contributor.authorRobb, John
dc.contributor.authorHarris, Oliver
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-20T12:11:10Z
dc.date.available2023-10-20T12:11:10Z
dc.date.created2023-09-25T13:22:03Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.issn1461-9571
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3097820
dc.description.abstractThis article is based on an EAA session in Kiel in 2021, in which thirteen contributors provide their response to Robb and Harris's (2018) overview of studies of gender in the European Neolithic and Bronze Age, with a reply by Robb and Harris. The central premise of their 2018 article was the opposition of ‘contextual Neolithic gender’ to ‘cross-contextual Bronze Age gender’, which created uneasiness among the four co-organizers of the Kiel meeting. Reading Robb and Harris's original article leaves the impression that there is an essentialist ‘Neolithic’ and ‘Bronze Age’ gender, the former being under-theorized, unclear, and unstable, the latter binary, unchangeable, and ideological. While Robb and Harris have clearly advanced the discussion on gender, the perspectives and case studies presented here, while critical of their views, take the debate further, painting a more complex and diverse picture that strives to avoid essentialism.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherCambridge University Pressen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleTo Gender or not To Gender? Exploring Gender Variations through Time and Spaceen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2023 The Author(s)en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode2
dc.identifier.doi10.1017/eaa.2022.51
dc.identifier.cristin2178586
dc.source.journalEuropean Journal of Archaeologyen_US
dc.source.pagenumber271-298en_US
dc.identifier.citationEuropean Journal of Archaeology. 2023, 26 (3), 271-298.en_US
dc.source.volume26en_US
dc.source.issue3en_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal