Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorEliassen, Finn
dc.contributor.authorBlåfjelldal, Vibeke
dc.contributor.authorHelland, Thomas
dc.contributor.authorHjorth, Cathrine Fonnesbech
dc.contributor.authorHølland, Kari
dc.contributor.authorLode, Lise
dc.contributor.authorBertelsen, Bjørn-Erik
dc.contributor.authorJanssen, Emiel
dc.contributor.authorMellgren, Gunnar
dc.contributor.authorKvaløy, Jan Terje
dc.contributor.authorSøiland, Håvard
dc.contributor.authorLende, Tone Hoel
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-19T08:40:33Z
dc.date.available2024-01-19T08:40:33Z
dc.date.created2023-08-31T09:26:07Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.issn1471-2407
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3112679
dc.description.abstractPurpose Adjuvant endocrine treatment is essential for treating luminal subtypes of breast cancer, which constitute 75% of all breast malignancies. However, the detrimental side effects of treatment make it difficult for many patients to complete the guideline-required treatment. Such non-adherence may jeopardize the lifesaving ability of anti-estrogen therapy. In this systematic review, we aimed to assess the consequences of non-adherence and non-persistence from available studies meeting strict statistical and clinical criteria. Methods A systematic literature search was performed using several databases, yielding identification of 2,026 studies. After strict selection, 14 studies were eligible for systematic review. The review included studies that examined endocrine treatment non-adherence (patients not taking treatment as prescribed) or non-persistence (patients stopping treatment prematurely), in terms of the effects on event-free survival or overall survival among women with non-metastatic breast cancer. Results We identified 10 studies measuring the effects of endocrine treatment non-adherence and non-persistence on event-free survival. Of these studies, seven showed significantly poorer survival for the non-adherent or non-persistent patient groups, with hazard ratios (HRs) ranging from 1.39 (95% CI, 1.07 to 1.53) to 2.44 (95% CI, 1.89 to 3.14). We identified nine studies measuring the effects of endocrine treatment non-adherence and non-persistence on overall survival. Of these studies, seven demonstrated significantly reduced overall survival in the groups with non-adherence and non-persistence, with HRs ranging from 1.26 (95% CI, 1.11 to 1.43) to 2.18 (95% CI, 1.99 to 2.39). Conclusion The present systematic review demonstrates that non-adherence and non-persistence to endocrine treatment negatively affect event-free and overall survival. Improved follow-up, with focus on adherence and persistence, is vital for improving health outcomes among patients with non-metastatic breast cancer.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherBMCen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleImportance of endocrine treatment adherence and persistence in breast cancer survivorship: a systematic reviewen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2023 The Author(s)en_US
dc.source.articlenumber625en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12885-023-11122-8
dc.identifier.cristin2171234
dc.source.journalBMC Canceren_US
dc.identifier.citationBMC Cancer. 2023, 23 (1), 625.en_US
dc.source.volume23en_US
dc.source.issue1en_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal