Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorNechanská, Blankaen_US
dc.contributor.authorMravčík, Viktoren_US
dc.contributor.authorSkurtveit, Svetlanaen_US
dc.contributor.authorLund, Ingunn Oleaen_US
dc.contributor.authorGabrhelík, Romanen_US
dc.contributor.authorEngeland, Andersen_US
dc.contributor.authorHandal, Marteen_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-06-18T11:55:59Z
dc.date.available2019-06-18T11:55:59Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.PublishedNechanská, Mravčík, Skurtveit S, Lund IO, Gabrhelík, Engeland A, Handal M. Neonatal outcomes after fetal exposure to methadone and buprenorphine: national registry studies from the Czech Republic and Norway. Addiction. 2018;113(7):1286-1294eng
dc.identifier.issn0965-2140
dc.identifier.issn1360-0443
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1956/20184
dc.description.abstractBackground and Aims Opioid maintenance treatment (OMT) is recommended to opioid‐dependent females during pregnancy. However, it is not clear which medication should be preferred. We aimed to compare neonatal outcomes after prenatal exposure to methadone (M) and buprenorphine (B) in two European countries. Design Nation‐wide register‐based cohort study using personalized IDs assigned to all citizens for data linkage. Setting The Czech Republic (2000–14) and Norway (2004–13). [Correction added after online publication on 26 April 2018: The Czech Republic (2000–04) corrected to (2000–14).] Participants Opioid‐dependent pregnant Czech (n = 333) and Norwegian (n = 235) women in OMT who received either B or M during pregnancy and their newborns. Measurements We linked data from health registries to identify the neonatal outcomes: gestational age, preterm birth, birth weight, length and head circumference, small for gestational age, miscarriages and stillbirth, neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) and Apgar score. We performed multivariate linear regression and binary logistic regression to explore the associations between M and B exposure and outcomes. Regression coefficient (β) and odds ratio (OR) were computed. Findings Most neonatal outcomes were more favourable after exposure to B compared with M, but none of the differences was statistically significant. For instance, in the multivariate analysis, birth weight was β = 111.6 g [95% confidence interval (CI) = −10.5 to 233.6 and β = 83.1 g, 95% CI = −100.8 to 267.0] higher after B exposure in the Czech Republic and Norway, respectively. Adjusted OR of NAS for B compared with M was 0.94 (95% CI = 0.46–1.92) in the Norwegian cohort. Conclusions Two national cohorts of women receiving opioid maintenance treatment during pregnancy showed small but not statistically significant differences in neonatal outcomes in favour of buprenorphine compared with methadone.en_US
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherWileyeng
dc.rightsAttribution CC BY-NC-NDeng
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/eng
dc.subjectBuprenorphineeng
dc.subjecthealth registrieseng
dc.subjectmethadoneeng
dc.subjectneonatal outcomeseng
dc.subjectopioid maintenance treatmenteng
dc.subjectprenatal exposureeng
dc.titleNeonatal outcomes after fetal exposure to methadone and buprenorphine: national registry studies from the Czech Republic and Norwayen_US
dc.typePeer reviewed
dc.typeJournal article
dc.date.updated2019-01-30T13:15:20Z
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2018 The Author(s)
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1111/add.14192
dc.identifier.cristin1592352
dc.source.journalAddiction
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 240197


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Attribution CC BY-NC-ND
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Attribution CC BY-NC-ND