Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorde Fleurian, Basile
dc.contributor.authorWerder, Mauro A.
dc.contributor.authorBeyer, Sebastian
dc.contributor.authorBrinkerhoff, Douglas J.
dc.contributor.authorDelaney, Ian
dc.contributor.authorDow, Christine F.
dc.contributor.authorDowns, Jacob
dc.contributor.authorGagliardini, Olivier
dc.contributor.authorHoffman, Matthew J.
dc.contributor.authorHooke, R. LeB.
dc.contributor.authorSeguinot, J.
dc.contributor.authorSommers, Aleah
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-17T16:38:26Z
dc.date.available2020-06-17T16:38:26Z
dc.date.issued2018-10-24
dc.Publishedde Fleurian B, Werder MA, Beyer S, Brinkerhoff DJ, et al. SHMIP The subglacial hydrology model intercomparison Project. Journal of Glaciology. 2018;64(248):897–916eng
dc.identifier.issn0022-1430en_US
dc.identifier.issn1727-5652en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1956/22692
dc.description.abstractSubglacial hydrology plays a key role in many glaciological processes, including ice dynamics via the modulation of basal sliding. Owing to the lack of an overarching theory, however, a variety of model approximations exist to represent the subglacial drainage system. The Subglacial Hydrology Model Intercomparison Project (SHMIP) provides a set of synthetic experiments to compare existing and future models. We present the results from 13 participating models with a focus on effective pressure and discharge. For many applications (e.g. steady states and annual variations, low input scenarios) a simple model, such as an inefficient-system-only model, a flowline or lumped model, or a porous-layer model provides results comparable to those of more complex models. However, when studying short term (e.g. diurnal) variations of the water pressure, the use of a two-dimensional model incorporating physical representations of both efficient and inefficient drainage systems yields results that are significantly different from those of simpler models and should be preferentially applied. The results also emphasise the role of water storage in the response of water pressure to transient recharge. Finally, we find that the localisation of moulins has a limited impact except in regions of sparse moulin density.en_US
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherCambridge University Pressen_US
dc.rightsAttribution CC BYeng
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/eng
dc.subjectglacier hydrologyeng
dc.subjectglacier modellingeng
dc.subjectglaciological model experimentseng
dc.subjectice-sheet modellingeng
dc.subjectsubglacial processeseng
dc.titleSHMIP The subglacial hydrology model intercomparison Projecten_US
dc.typePeer reviewed
dc.typeJournal article
dc.date.updated2019-12-05T11:25:21Z
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2018 The Author(s)en_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1017/jog.2018.78
dc.identifier.cristin1623183
dc.source.journalJournal of Glaciology
dc.relation.projectEC/FP7: 610055
dc.relation.projectNotur/NorStore: NN4659K


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Attribution CC BY
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Attribution CC BY