Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorChristensen, Tom
dc.contributor.authorLægreid, Per
dc.contributor.authorRykkja, Lise H.
dc.contributor.editorGephart, Robert P. Jr
dc.contributor.editorMiller, C. Chet
dc.contributor.editorHelgesson, Karin Svedberg
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-04T11:45:09Z
dc.date.available2020-08-04T11:45:09Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.PublishedChristensen T, Lægreid P, Rykkja L: The Co-evolution of Reputation Management, Governance Capacity, Legitimacy and Accountability in Crisis Managment. In: Gephart, Miller, Helgesson. The Routledge Companion to Risk, Crisis and Emergency Managment, 2019. Routledge p. 177-191eng
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1956/23403
dc.description.abstractDealing with crises is a main responsibility of government authorities. Crises strike at the core of democratic governance and challenge not only capacity but also legitimacy and accountability. They are a test of whether an organization can meet citizens’ expectations. Crisis management studies often focus on governance capacity, investigating how the government can effectively prepare for, handle and learn from different crises. One way to do this is to study how governments structure their organizations responsible for crisis and how they use their overall capacity and resources (Christensen, Lægreid, & Rykkja, 2016).en_US
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherRoutledgeeng
dc.titleThe Co-evolution of Reputation Management, Governance Capacity, Legitimacy and Accountability in Crisis Managmenteng
dc.typeChapteren_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.date.updated2020-01-10T11:43:46Z
dc.description.versionacceptedVersion
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2018 Routledgeen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.4324/9781315458175
dc.identifier.cristin1704659


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel