Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorUleberg, Kai-Eriken_US
dc.contributor.authorMunk, Ane Cecilieen_US
dc.contributor.authorBrede, Catoen_US
dc.contributor.authorGudlaugsson, Einaren_US
dc.contributor.authorDiermen, Bianca vanen_US
dc.contributor.authorSkaland, Ivaren_US
dc.contributor.authorMalpica, Anaisen_US
dc.contributor.authorJanssen, Emilius Adrianus Mariaen_US
dc.contributor.authorHjelle, Anneen_US
dc.contributor.authorBaak, Jan P. A.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-02-06T09:45:56Z
dc.date.available2012-02-06T09:45:56Z
dc.date.issued2011-06-28eng
dc.identifier.issn1477-5956
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1956/5544
dc.description.abstractBackground: Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) grades 2 and 3 are usually grouped and treated in the same way as “high grade”, in spite of their different risk to cancer progression and spontaneous regression rates. CIN2-3 is usually diagnosed in formaldehyde-fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) punch biopsies. This procedure virtually eliminates the availability of water-soluble proteins which could have diagnostic and prognostic value. Aim: To investigate whether a water-soluble protein-saving biopsy processing method followed by a proteomic analysis of supernatant samples using LC-MS/MS (LTQ Orbitrap) can be used to distinguish between CIN2 and CIN3. Methods: Fresh cervical punch biopsies from 20 women were incubated in RPMI1640 medium for 24 hours at 4°C for protein extraction and subsequently subjected to standard FFPE processing. P16 and Ki67-supported histologic consensus review CIN grade (CIN2, n = 10, CIN3, n = 10) was assessed by independent gynecological pathologists. The biopsy supernatants were depleted of 7 high abundance proteins prior to uni-dimensional LC-MS/MS analysis for protein identifications. Results: The age of the patients ranged from 25-40 years (median 29.7), and mean protein concentration was 0.81 mg/ml (range 0.55 - 1.14). After application of multistep identification criteria, 114 proteins were identified, including proteins like vimentin, actin, transthyretin, apolipoprotein A-1, Heat Shock protein beta 1, vitamin D binding protein and different cytokeratins. The identified proteins are annotated to metabolic processes (36%), signal transduction (27%), cell cycle processes (15%) and trafficking/transport (9%). Using binary logistic regression, Cytokeratin 2 was found to have the strongest independent discriminatory power resulting in 90% overall correct classification. Conclusions: 114 proteins were identified in supernatants from fresh cervical biopsies and many differed between CIN2 and 3. Cytokeratin 2 is the strongest discriminator with 90% overall correct classifications.en_US
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherBioMed Centraleng
dc.rightsAttribution CC BYeng
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/eng
dc.subjectCervical intraepithelial neoplasiaeng
dc.subjectProteomicseng
dc.subjectLTQ-Orbitrapeng
dc.subjectMass spectrometryeng
dc.titleDiscrimination of grade 2 and 3 cervical intraepithelial neoplasia by means of analysis of water soluble proteins recovered from cervical biopsiesen_US
dc.typePeer reviewed
dc.typeJournal article
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2011 Uleberg et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
dc.source.articlenumber36
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1186/1477-5956-9-36
dc.source.journalProteome Science
dc.source.409
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Medical disciplines: 700::Clinical medical disciplines: 750::Oncology: 762eng


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution CC BY
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution CC BY