Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorJakobsen, Hilde
dc.date.accessioned2014-07-01T14:00:46Z
dc.date.available2014-07-01T14:00:46Z
dc.date.issued2012-04eng
dc.identifier.issn1468-7941
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1956/8043
dc.description.abstractThis article examines some methodological issues that arise when conducting focus group discussions in the majority world (developing countries), and describes one way of addressing them. While the method is widely used in the majority world, the methodological literature on how to moderate focus groups builds on accumulated experiences of how conversations work in the minority world (developed countries). This article suggests a way to apply the method more rigorously in a majority-world context. It draws on a trial-and-error innovation process spanning 40 discussions in Tanzania. Ensuring quality in data generation required thorough attention to issues of alterity, positionality and power. These issues are common challenges to methodological rigour when researching across difference in the majority world. But this article contends that if used correctly and to its strengths, the focus group method can indeed address and solve these challenges. This also entails creating appropriate conditions for interaction among focus groups participants.en_US
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherSAGEeng
dc.relation.ispartof<a href="http://hdl.handle.net/1956/10118" target="blank">The Good Beating: Social norms supporting men’s partner violence in Tanzania</a>eng
dc.subjectFocus Group Discussionseng
dc.subjectQualitative methodseng
dc.subjectQualitative methodologyeng
dc.subjectDevelopment Studieseng
dc.subjectAfricaeng
dc.subjectTanzaniaeng
dc.subjectPositionalityeng
dc.subjectReflexivityeng
dc.subjectData qualityeng
dc.subjectQualitative researcheng
dc.subjectFieldworkeng
dc.titleMaking optimal use of the Focus Group method in Tanzaniaeng
dc.typePeer reviewed
dc.typeJournal article
dc.description.versionacceptedVersion
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2012 by The Author
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1177/1468794111416145
dc.identifier.cristin951684
dc.source.journalQualitative Research
dc.source.4012
dc.source.142
dc.source.pagenumber111-130


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel