Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorAckermans, Hannah
dc.date.accessioned2021-01-05T11:30:06Z
dc.date.available2021-01-05T11:30:06Z
dc.date.created2020-12-26T15:42:59Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.PublishedAmerican Quarterly. 2020, 72 (4), 1011-1020.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0003-0678
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2721449
dc.description.abstractIn this digital project review, I discuss the companion website CriticalCodeStudies.com in relation to Mark C. Marino’s book Critical Code Studies (2020). Over the past decades, companion websites have become a small but persistently growing genre in academe, with products ranging from paratextual records to publications in their own right. The Critical Code Studies companion website makes excellent use of content and design to make mediaspecific arguments that interrogate the research subject, foregrounding a method that oscillates between close reading and contextual reading as well as promotes personal and communal reading practices. The combination of book and companion website successfully makes intellectual interventions not only into the case studies but also into our conception of source code in general. I review how the companion website reflects, amplifies, and contradicts the arguments made in the book.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherJohns Hopkins University Pressen_US
dc.titleHow an Academic Companion Website Makes Media-Specific Argumentsen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.description.versionacceptedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2020 The American Studies Associationen_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextpostprint
cristin.fulltextpostprint
cristin.qualitycode2
dc.identifier.doi10.1353/aq.2020.0057
dc.identifier.cristin1863277
dc.source.journalAmerican Quarterlyen_US
dc.source.4072en_US
dc.source.144en_US
dc.source.pagenumber1011-1020en_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel