Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRaj, Roshin Pappukutty
dc.contributor.authorAndersen, Ole Baltazar
dc.contributor.authorJohannessen, Johnny Andre
dc.contributor.authorBenjamin, Gutknech
dc.contributor.authorChatterjee, Sourav
dc.contributor.authorRose, Stine
dc.contributor.authorBonaduce, Antonio
dc.contributor.authorHorwath, Martin
dc.contributor.authorRanndal, Heidi
dc.contributor.authorRichter, Kristin
dc.contributor.authorPalanisamy, Hindumathi
dc.contributor.authorLudwigsen, Carsten
dc.contributor.authorBertino, Laurent
dc.contributor.authorNilsen, Jan Even Øie
dc.contributor.authorKnudsen, Per
dc.contributor.authorHogg, Anna E.
dc.contributor.authorCazenave, Anny
dc.contributor.authorBenveniste, Jérôme
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-10T10:33:41Z
dc.date.available2021-02-10T10:33:41Z
dc.date.created2020-09-02T15:52:28Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.PublishedRemote Sensing. 2020, 125, 2837en_US
dc.identifier.issn2072-4292
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2727143
dc.description.abstractSea level change is an important indicator of climate change. Our study focuses on the sea level budget assessment of the Arctic Ocean using: (1) the newly reprocessed satellite altimeter data with major changes in the processing techniques; (2) ocean mass change data derived from GRACE satellite gravimetry; (3) and steric height estimated from gridded hydrographic data for the GRACE/Argo time period (2003–2016). The Beaufort Gyre (BG) and the Nordic Seas (NS) regions exhibit the largest positive trend in sea level during the study period. Halosteric sea level change is found to dominate the area averaged sea level trend of BG, while the trend in NS is found to be influenced by halosteric and ocean mass change effects. Temporal variability of sea level in these two regions reveals a significant shift in the trend pattern centered around 2009–2011. Analysis suggests that this shift can be explained by a change in large-scale atmospheric circulation patterns over the Arctic. The sea level budget assessment of the Arctic found a residual trend of more than 1.0 mm/yr. This nonclosure of the sea level budget is further attributed to the limitations of the three above mentioned datasets in the Arctic region.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMDPIen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleArctic Sea level Budget Assessment During the GRACE/Argo Time Perioden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2020 by the authorsen_US
dc.source.articlenumber2837en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/rs12172837
dc.identifier.cristin1826857
dc.source.journalRemote Sensingen_US
dc.source.40125en_US
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 261743en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal