Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorHjelle, Anja Myhre
dc.contributor.authorGjertsen, Jan-Erik
dc.contributor.authorApalset, Ellen Margrete
dc.contributor.authorNilsen, Roy Miodini
dc.contributor.authorLober, Anja
dc.contributor.authorTell, Grethe S.
dc.contributor.authorPawel, Mielnik
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-11T21:07:40Z
dc.date.available2021-02-11T21:07:40Z
dc.date.created2020-12-12T10:56:03Z
dc.date.issued2020-12
dc.PublishedBMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2020, 21 1-5.
dc.identifier.issn1471-2474
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2727531
dc.description.abstractBackground: It is mechanically plausible that osteoporosis leads to more severe peripheral fractures, but studies investigating associations between BMD and radiographically verified complexity of distal radius fractures are scarce. This study aims to study the association between osteoporosis, as well as other risk factors for fracture, and the AO classification of distal radius fractures. Methods: In this observational study, 289 consecutive patients aged ≥40 years with a distal radius fracture were included. Bone mineral density (BMD) of the hips and spine was measured by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA), and comorbidities, medication, physical activity, smoking habits, body mass index (BMI), and history of previous fracture were registered. The distal radius fractures were classified according to the Müller AO system (AO) (type B and C regarded as most complex). Results: Patients with osteoporosis (n = 130) did not have increased odds of a more complex distal radius fracture (type B + C, n = 192)) (n = vs type A (n = 92) (OR 1.1 [95% CI 0.5 to 2.3]) compared to those with osteopenia /normal BMD (n = 159). Patients with AO fracture types A or C had a higher prevalence of osteoporosis than patients with type B fracture. Conclusions: Distal radius fracture patients with osteoporosis did not sustain more complex fractures than those with osteopenia/normal BMD according to the AO classification system. The AO classification of distal radius fracture cannot be used to decide which patients should be referred to DXA scan and considered for secondary fracture prevention.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherBMCen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleNo association between osteoporosis and AO classification of distal radius fractures: an observational study of 289 patientsen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright The Author(s)en_US
dc.source.articlenumber811 (2020)en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12891-020-03842-w
dc.identifier.cristin1859008
dc.source.journalBMC Musculoskeletal Disordersen_US
dc.source.4021
dc.source.pagenumber1-5en_US
dc.identifier.citationBMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2020, 21, 811.
dc.source.volume21en_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal