Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLöffeler, Sven
dc.contributor.authorHalland, Adrian
dc.contributor.authorFawad, Haris
dc.contributor.authorBeisland, Christian
dc.contributor.authorHaug, Erik Skaaheim
dc.PublishedScandinavian Journal of Urology. 2020, 54 (2), 105-109.
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To determine the rationale for not offering local treatment to prostate cancer patients with non-metastatic disease at diagnosis who later died of prostate cancer and to document local and systemic complications caused by disease progression. Material and Methods: In this population-based, retrospective study we reviewed the medical records of all patients who died of prostate cancer in 2009–2014 in Vestfold County (Vestfold Mortality Study), who were non-metastatic at diagnosis and who had received no local treatment to the prostate (n = 117). Results: A review of patient records demonstrated that the chronological age of 75 years or older was the main rationale for not offering local treatment to the prostate (37%, n = 43). No consideration was given to the functional status and patient health. These elderly patients stood for almost one-fifth of the total PC mortality in Vestfold County. In addition to dying from PC, 86% of patients developed local complications attributable to PC progression. Observation of strict limits for local treatment with regard to tumor characteristics contributed further to the underuse of local treatment. Conclusions: Our study demonstrated systematic undertreatment of elderly patients with aggressive, non-metastatic PC with regard to local treatment based on chronological age alone. The patients in this study died of prostate cancer and the majority experienced significant morbidity caused by local tumor growth.en_US
dc.publisherTaylor & Francisen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.titleNon-metastatic prostate cancer: rationale for conservative treatment and impact on disease-related morbidity and mortality in the elderlyen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2020 The Author(s).en_US
dc.source.journalScandinavian Journal of Urologyen_US
dc.identifier.citationScandinavian Journal of Urology. 2020, 54 (2) , 105–109en_US

Files in this item


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal