Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorIsigonis, Panagiotis
dc.contributor.authorAfantitis, Antreas
dc.contributor.authorAntunes, Dalila
dc.contributor.authorBartonova, Alena
dc.contributor.authorBeitollahi, Ali
dc.contributor.authorBohmer, Nils
dc.contributor.authorBouman, Evert
dc.contributor.authorChaudhry, Qasim
dc.contributor.authorCimpan, Mihaela Roxana
dc.contributor.authorCimpan, Emil
dc.contributor.authorDoak, Shareen
dc.contributor.authorDupin, Damien
dc.contributor.authorFedrigo, Doreen
dc.contributor.authorFessard, Valérie
dc.contributor.authorGromelski, Maciej
dc.contributor.authorGutleb, Arno C.
dc.contributor.authorHalappanavar, Sabina
dc.contributor.authorHoet, Peter
dc.contributor.authorJeliazkova, Nina
dc.contributor.authorJomini, Stéphane
dc.contributor.authorLindner, Sabine
dc.contributor.authorLinkov, Igor
dc.contributor.authorLonghin, Eleonora Marta
dc.contributor.authorLynch, Iseult
dc.contributor.authorMalsch, Ineke
dc.contributor.authorMarcomini, Antonio
dc.contributor.authorMariussen, Espen
dc.contributor.authorFuente, Jesus M. de la
dc.contributor.authorMelagraki, Georgia
dc.contributor.authorMurphy, Finbarr
dc.contributor.authorNeaves, Michael
dc.contributor.authorPackroff, Rolf
dc.contributor.authorPfuhler, Stefan
dc.contributor.authorPuzyn, Tomasz
dc.contributor.authorRahman, Qamar
dc.contributor.authorPran, Elise Rundén
dc.contributor.authorSemenzin, Elena
dc.contributor.authorSerchi, Tommaso
dc.contributor.authorSteinbach, Christoph
dc.contributor.authorTrump, Benjamin
dc.contributor.authorVrček, Ivana Vinković
dc.contributor.authorWarheit, David
dc.contributor.authorWiesner, Mark R.
dc.contributor.authorWillighagen, Egon
dc.contributor.authorDusinska, Maria
dc.description.abstractNanotechnologies have reached maturity and market penetration that require nano‐specific changes in legislation and harmonization among legislation domains, such as the amendments to REACH for nanomaterials (NMs) which came into force in 2020. Thus, an assessment of the components and regulatory boundaries of NMs risk governance is timely, alongside related methods and tools, as part of the global efforts to optimise nanosafety and integrate it into product design processes, via Safe(r)‐by‐Design (SbD) concepts. This paper provides an overview of the state‐of‐the‐art regarding risk governance of NMs and lays out the theoretical basis for the development and implementation of an effective, trustworthy and transparent risk governance framework for NMs. The proposed framework enables continuous integration of the evolving state of the science, leverages best practice from contiguous disciplines and facilitates responsive re‐thinking of nanosafety governance to meet future needs. To achieve and operationalise such framework, a science‐based Risk Governance Council (RGC) for NMs is being developed. The framework will provide a toolkit for independent NMs' risk governance and integrates needs and views of stakeholders. An extension of this framework to relevant advanced materials and emerging technologies is also envisaged, in view of future foundations of risk research in Europe and globally.en_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.titleRisk Governance of Emerging Technologies Demonstrated in Terms of its Applicability to Nanomaterialsen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2020 The Authors.en_US
dc.relation.projectNILU - Norsk institutt for luftforskning: 119011en_US
dc.relation.projectNILU - Norsk institutt for luftforskning: 119012en_US
dc.identifier.citationSmall. 2020, 16 (36), 2003303.en_US

Files in this item


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal