Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorHoel, Ida Marie
dc.contributor.authorSviland, Lisbeth
dc.contributor.authorSyre, Heidi
dc.contributor.authorDyrhol-Riise, Anne Ma
dc.contributor.authorSkarstein, Ingerid
dc.contributor.authorJebsen, Peter Wilhelm
dc.contributor.authorJørstad, Melissa Davidsen
dc.contributor.authorWiker, Harald G
dc.contributor.authorMustafa, Tehmina
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-21T09:35:30Z
dc.date.available2021-04-21T09:35:30Z
dc.date.created2020-02-21T10:23:06Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.issn1471-2334
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2738826
dc.description.abstractBackground Extrapulmonary tuberculosis (EPTB) poses diagnostic challenges due to the paucibacillary nature of the disease. The immunochemistry-based MPT64 antigen detection test (MPT64 test) has shown promising results for diagnosing EPTB in previous studies performed in low-resource settings, with higher sensitivity than microscopy and culture. The aim of this study was to investigate the performance of the MPT64 test in a routine clinical setting in a high-income low TB prevalence country. Methods Extrapulmonary samples sent for TB diagnostics to microbiology and pathology laboratories at three regional tertiary care hospitals in Norway in a one-year period were included and subjected to the MPT64 test in parallel to the routine TB diagnostic tests. Results Samples from 288 patients were included and categorised as confirmed TB cases (n = 26), clinically diagnosed TB cases (n = 5), non-TB cases (n = 243) and uncategorised (n = 14), using a composite reference standard (CRS). In formalin-fixed biopsies, the sensitivity (95% CI) of the MPT64 test, microscopy, PCR-based tests pooled, and culture was 37% (16–62), 20% (4–48), 37% (16–62) and 50% (23–77), respectively, against the CRS. The MPT64 test showed a good positive predictive value (88%) and an excellent specificity (99, 95% CI 92–100) in formalin-fixed biopsies. In fine-needle aspirates, pus and fluid samples, the test performance was lower. Conclusions The MPT64 test was implementable in pathology laboratories as part of routine diagnostics, and although the sensitivity of the MPT64 test was not better than culture in this setting, the test supplements other rapid diagnostic methods, including microscopy and PCR-based tests, and can contribute to strengthen the diagnosis of EPTB in formalin-fixed biopsies in the absence of culture confirmation.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherBMCen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleDiagnosis of extrapulmonary tuberculosis using the MPT64 antigen detection test in a high-income low tuberculosis prevalence settingen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2020 The Authorsen_US
dc.source.articlenumber130en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextpostprint
cristin.fulltextpostprint
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-020-4852-z
dc.identifier.cristin1796379
dc.source.journalBMC Infectious Diseasesen_US
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 234457en_US
dc.identifier.citationBMC Infectious Diseases. 2020, 20, 130en_US
dc.source.volume20en_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal