Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorLudvigsen, Kristine
dc.contributor.authorKrumsvik, Rune Johan
dc.contributor.authorBreivik, Jens
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-06T12:12:42Z
dc.date.available2021-05-06T12:12:42Z
dc.date.created2019-10-10T21:40:11Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.PublishedBritish Journal of Educational Technology (BJET). 2020, 1-17.
dc.identifier.issn0007-1013
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2753942
dc.description.abstractThis study investigated the characteristics of peer discussions used to support formative assessment in lectures, facilitated by a student response system, in an undergraduate qualitative methods course for psychology students. The intent was to examine the characteristics of peer discussions in which student response systems are used to facilitate the practice of formative assessment lectures. The research was guided by the following research questions: (1) What patterns of talk can be identified in the discussions? (2) How do the students use subject‐specific vocabulary in the discussions? (3) How the students’ understanding of the subject matter displayed in these discussions? To examine the characteristics of peer interactions, 87 student discussions were recorded and analysed. The concept of exploratory talk was used as a lens to examine the discussions. In 68 of the 87 discussions, the students exchanged ideas and elaborated on their peers’ ideas and understanding of the concepts. In the remaining 25 discussions, the process of reasoning was less visible. The findings are relevant for teaching designs that aims to use digital tools to facilitate formative assessment.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse-Ikkekommersiell 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleBehind the scenes: Unpacking student discussion and critical reflection in lecturesen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2020 The Authorsen_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/bjet.12922
dc.identifier.cristin1736256
dc.source.journalBritish Journal of Educational Technology (BJET)en_US
dc.source.pagenumber2478-2494en_US
dc.identifier.citationBritish Journal of Educational Technology (BJET). 2020, 51(6), 2478-2494en_US
dc.source.volume51en_US
dc.source.issue6en_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse-Ikkekommersiell 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse-Ikkekommersiell 4.0 Internasjonal