Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorPirotta, Enrico
dc.contributor.authorHin, Vincent
dc.contributor.authorMangel, Marc
dc.contributor.authorNew, Leslie
dc.contributor.authorCosta, Daniel P.
dc.contributor.authorde Roos, André M.
dc.contributor.authorHarwood, John
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-07T12:34:40Z
dc.date.available2021-05-07T12:34:40Z
dc.date.created2020-09-24T14:50:13Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.PublishedAmerican Naturalist. 2020, 196 (4), 1-17.
dc.identifier.issn0003-0147
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2754184
dc.description.abstractAnimals initiate, interrupt, or invest resources in reproduction in light of their physiology and the environment. The energetic risks entailed in an individual’s reproductive strategy can influence the ability to cope with additional stressors, such as anthropogenic climate change and disturbance. To explore the trade-offs between internal state, external resource availability, and reproduction, we applied state-dependent life-history theory (SDLHT) to a dynamic energy budget (DEB) model for long-finned pilot whales (Globicephala melas). We investigated the reproductive strategies emerging from the interplay between fitness maximization and propensity to take energetic risks, as well as the resulting susceptibility of individual vital rates to disturbance. Without disturbance, facultative reproductive behavior from SDLHT and fixed rules in the DEB model led to comparable individual fitness. However, under disturbance, the reproductive strategies emerging from SDLHT increased vulnerability to energetic risks, resulting in lower fitness than fixed rules. These fragile strategies might therefore be unlikely to evolve in the first place. Heterogeneous resource availability favored more cautious (and thus more robust) strategies, particularly when knowledge of resource variation was accurate. Our results demonstrate that the assumptions regarding the dynamic trade-offs underlying an individual’s decision-making can have important consequences for predicting the effects of anthropogenic stressors on wildlife populations.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherThe University of Chicago Pressen_US
dc.titlePropensity for risk in reproductive strategy affects susceptibility to anthropogenic disturbanceen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2020 The University of Chicagoen_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode2
dc.identifier.doi10.1086/710150
dc.identifier.cristin1833116
dc.source.journalAmerican Naturalisten_US
dc.source.40196
dc.source.144
dc.source.pagenumberE71–E87en_US
dc.identifier.citationAmerican Naturalist. 2020, 196(4), E71–E87en_US
dc.source.volume196en_US
dc.source.issue4en_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel