Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorChristensen, Tom
dc.contributor.authorLægreid, Per
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-20T12:51:41Z
dc.date.available2021-05-20T12:51:41Z
dc.date.created2020-02-03T14:19:03Z
dc.date.issued2020-02-02
dc.PublishedInternational Journal of Public Administration. 2020, .
dc.identifier.issn0190-0692
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2755911
dc.description.abstractThis article aims at addressing the relationship between expertise and politics by examining a reorganization process of Statistics Norway. The puzzle is why a minor reorganization with low political salience, in a consensus-oriented political administrative setting with high level of trust between ministries and agencies, and high autonomy for agencies ended up as a major conflict resulting in the resignation of the agency director. Based on an instrumental, a cultural and a symbolic perspective the article examines the internal and external dynamics ensuing from conflicting views regarding the balance between political control and professional autonomy, and from reorganization proposals that represented a break with the cultural path the organization had followed. It adds insights into the tensions between different types of institutional logics, resulting in institutional hybridity.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherRoutledgeen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleThe Demise of an Agency Director – A Puzzling Saga of Political Control and Professional Autonomy.en_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2020 The Author(s)en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/01900692.2019.1707224
dc.identifier.cristin1790272
dc.source.journalInternational Journal of Public Administrationen_US
dc.source.pagenumber250-261en_US
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Public Administration. 2021, 44 (3), 250-261en_US
dc.source.volume44en_US
dc.source.issue3en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal