Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorGorlée, Dinda
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-26T11:45:27Z
dc.date.available2021-05-26T11:45:27Z
dc.date.created2020-11-09T13:00:35Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.PublishedChinese Semiotic Studies. 2020, 16 (1), 1-46.
dc.identifier.issn2198-9605
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2756447
dc.description.abstractTranslation, for Saussure, assumed the codified rule of language respecting the difference between synchronic and diachronic linguistics. Translation may be regarded as a theoretical possibility, though impossible for the creative speech of language speakers. Peirce’s logical semiotics reasoned the linguistic-and-cultural (linguïcultural) interpretants of received signs. Semiotranslation is a semiotic game to change the symbiosis of two languages into one language. Identified with both Saussure and Peirce, Jakobson’s intralingual, interlingual, and intersemiotic forms of translation propose rewording, translation proper, and transmutation. Peirce’s semiosis creates simple and complex symbols but navigates between translation, semiotranslation, and transduction. Translation derives from the para-functions of replicas in “paraphrase” and “parasite” to signify the multiplicity of ideas and trends in biotranslation. The source text can be re-organized into the iconic activity of Saussurean paraphrase; or the target text can be indexically recontextualized in the parasitical evolution of Peirce’s instinct and facts of life applied to arts — neither approaching pure science.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherDe Gruyteren_US
dc.titleParaphrase or parasite? The Semiotic Stories of Translationen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Bostonen_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.doi10.1515/css-2020-0001
dc.identifier.cristin1846139
dc.source.journalChinese Semiotic Studiesen_US
dc.source.4016
dc.source.141
dc.source.pagenumber1-46en_US
dc.identifier.citationChinese Semiotic Studies. 2020, 16(1), 1–46en_US
dc.source.volume16en_US
dc.source.issue1en_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel