Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorWhitaker, Rebecca
dc.contributor.authorSperber, Nina
dc.contributor.authorBaumgartner, Michael Clemens
dc.contributor.authorThiem, Alrik
dc.contributor.authorCragun, Deborah
dc.contributor.authorDamschroder, Laura
dc.contributor.authorMiech, Edward J.
dc.contributor.authorSlade, Alecia
dc.contributor.authorBirken, Sarah
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-21T13:33:36Z
dc.date.available2021-06-21T13:33:36Z
dc.date.created2020-12-14T09:58:29Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.issn1748-5908
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2760461
dc.description.abstractBackground Implementation of multifaceted interventions typically involves many diverse elements working together in interrelated ways, including intervention components, implementation strategies, and features of local context. Given this real-world complexity, implementation researchers may be interested in a new mathematical, cross-case method called Coincidence Analysis (CNA) that has been designed explicitly to support causal inference, answer research questions about combinations of conditions that are minimally necessary or sufficient for an outcome, and identify the possible presence of multiple causal paths to an outcome. CNA can be applied as a standalone method or in conjunction with other approaches and can reveal new empirical findings related to implementation that might otherwise have gone undetected. Methods We applied CNA to a publicly available dataset from Sweden with county-level data on human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination campaigns and vaccination uptake in 2012 and 2014 and then compared CNA results to the published regression findings. Results The original regression analysis found vaccination uptake was positively associated only with the availability of vaccines in schools. CNA produced different findings and uncovered an additional solution path: high vaccination rates were achieved by either (1) offering the vaccine in all schools or (2) a combination of offering the vaccine in some schools and media coverage. Conclusions CNA offers a new comparative approach for researchers seeking to understand how implementation conditions work together and link to outcomes.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherBMCen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleCoincidence analysis: a new method for causal inference in implementation scienceen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2020 The Authorsen_US
dc.source.articlenumber108en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s13012-020-01070-3
dc.identifier.cristin1859345
dc.source.journalImplementation Scienceen_US
dc.source.4015
dc.identifier.citationImplementation Science. 2020, 15, 108en_US
dc.source.volume15en_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal