Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorParkkinen, Veli-Pekka
dc.contributor.authorWilliamson, Jon
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-23T11:09:18Z
dc.date.available2021-06-23T11:09:18Z
dc.date.created2020-10-29T12:17:22Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.isbn9783030291785
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2760847
dc.description.abstractIn this chapter we explore the process of extrapolating causal claims from model organisms to humans in pharmacology. We describe and compare four strategies of extrapolation: enumerative induction, comparative process tracing, phylogenetic reasoning, and robustness reasoning. We argue that evidence of mechanisms plays a crucial role in several strategies for extrapolation and in the underlying logic of extrapolation: the more directly a strategy establishes mechanistic similarities between a model and humans, the more reliable the extrapolation. We present case studies from the research on atherosclerosis and the development of statins, that illustrate these strategies and the role of mechanistic evidence in extrapolation.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.relation.ispartofUncertainty in Pharmacology. Epistemology, Methods and Decisions.
dc.titleExtrapolating from model organisms in pharmacologyen_US
dc.typeChapteren_US
dc.description.versionacceptedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2020 Springeren_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextpostprint
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29179-2_3
dc.identifier.cristin1843250
dc.source.pagenumber59-78en_US
dc.identifier.citationIn: LaCaze A., Osimani B. (eds) Uncertainty in Pharmacology. Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science, 2020, 338, 59-78en_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel