Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorBertholet, Jenny
dc.contributor.authorAnastasi, Gail
dc.contributor.authorNoble, David
dc.contributor.authorBel, Arjan
dc.contributor.authorvan Leeuwen, Ruud
dc.contributor.authorRoggen, Toon
dc.contributor.authorDuchateau, Michael
dc.contributor.authorPilskog, Sara
dc.contributor.authorGaribaldi, Cristina
dc.contributor.authorTilly, Nina
dc.contributor.authorGarcía-Mollá, Rafael
dc.contributor.authorBonaque, Jorge
dc.contributor.authorOelfke, Uwe
dc.contributor.authorAznar, Marianne C.
dc.contributor.authorHeijmen, Ben J.M.
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-24T06:59:01Z
dc.date.available2021-06-24T06:59:01Z
dc.date.created2021-02-10T16:50:08Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.issn0167-8140
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2760991
dc.description.abstractPurpose The POP-ART RT study aims to determine to what extent and how intrafractional real-time respiratory motion management (RRMM), and plan adaptation for interfractional anatomical changes (ART) are used in clinical practice and to understand barriers to implementation. Here we report on part II: ART using more than one plan per target per treatment course. Materials and methods A questionnaire on the current practice of ART, wishes for expansion or implementation, and barriers to implementation was distributed worldwide. Four types of ART were discriminated: daily online replanning, online plan library, protocolled offline replanning (all three based on a protocol), and ad-hoc offline replanning. Results The questionnaire was completed by 177 centres from 40 countries. ART was used by 61% of respondents (31% with protocol) for a median (range) of 3 (1–8) tumour sites. CBCT/MVCT was the main imaging modality except for online daily replanning (11 users) where 10 users used MR. Two thirds of respondents wished to implement ART for a new tumour site; 40% of these had plans to do it in the next 2 years. Human/material resources and technical limitations were the main barriers to further use and implementation. Conclusions ART was used for a broad range of tumour sites, mainly with ad-hoc offline replanning and for a median of 3 tumour sites. There was a large interest in implementing ART for more tumour sites, mainly limited by human/material resources and technical limitations. Daily online replanning was primarily performed on MR-linacs.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titlePatterns of practice for adaptive and real-time radiation therapy (POP-ART RT) part II: Offline and online plan adaption for interfractional changesen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2020 The Authors.en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.radonc.2020.06.017
dc.identifier.cristin1888649
dc.source.journalRadiotherapy and Oncologyen_US
dc.source.pagenumber88-96en_US
dc.identifier.citationRadiotherapy and Oncology. 2020, 153, 88-96.en_US
dc.source.volume153en_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal