Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorNilsen, Ann
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-05T13:03:55Z
dc.date.available2021-07-05T13:03:55Z
dc.date.created2020-09-16T12:34:05Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.issn0038-0261
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2763451
dc.description.abstractThe adult person is in sociological literature often referred to as a genderless and classless being. As a life course phase it is implicitly viewed as a static destination after a dynamic transition period of youth. The aim of this article is to empirically examine perceptions of adulthood in biographical interviews in three-generation Norwegian families. A case-based biographical approach related to gender and social class across historical periods is at the core of the analysis. Thoughts on independence and the Mead-inspired concept of relationality are used as sensitising concepts to examine general ideals and personal considerations in notions of adulthood. The analyses indicate variations over historical periods, generations and life course phases wherein relationality or independence become significant. Relationality may take on different meanings with reference to period-specific gender expectations such as the male provider role and women as the primary carer in families in the oldest generations. Ideals of individual independence as choice or necessity vary according to life course phase, social class and period-specific conditions.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherSAGEen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleIndependence and relationality in notions of adulthood across generations, gender and social classen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright the authoren_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode2
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/0038026120931425
dc.identifier.cristin1830414
dc.source.journalSociological Reviewen_US
dc.source.pagenumber123-138en_US
dc.identifier.citationSociological Review. 2021, 69 (1), 123-138en_US
dc.source.volume69en_US
dc.source.issue1en_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal