Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorHimle, Aslak E
dc.contributor.authorHavik, Odd E.
dc.contributor.authorThimm, Jens
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-07T07:35:04Z
dc.date.available2021-07-07T07:35:04Z
dc.date.created2020-05-17T12:14:38Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.PublishedNordic Psychology. 2020, 1-16.
dc.identifier.issn1901-2276
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2763649
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the internal consistency, factor structure, and validity of the Leiden Index of Depression Sensitivity-Revised (LEIDS-R) and a recent revision of the LEIDS-R (LEIDS-RR) in Norway. The LEIDS-R is a self-report inventory measuring cognitive reactivity. Cognitive reactivity is defined as the relative ease with which negative thinking is activated by mild low mood and has been shown to be a strong predictor of relapse of depression. Hospital employees and psychology students (N = 240) completed the LEIDS-R and measures of depression, repetitive negative thinking, and mindfulness. The results showed that Cronbach’s alpha was equally high for both the LEIDS-R and LEIDS-RR total score (α = .92), indicating good internal consistency. Confirmatory factor analysis of the LEIDS-R suggested an acceptable model fit for the original first-order six-factor model. Confirmatory factor analyses of the LEIDS-RR suggested the best fit for a bifactor five-factor model. Correlational analyses showed positive associations of the LEIDS-R and LEIDS-RR scales with depression and repetitive negative thinking and negative relationships with mindfulness. It is concluded that the Norwegian versions of the LEIDS-R and LEIDS-RR appear to be both reliable and valid for future use.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherTaylor & Francisen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.no
dc.titleThe Leiden Index of Depression Sensitivity-Revised (LEIDS-R) and its revision (LEIDS-RR): An investigation of the internal structure and conceptual validity in a Norwegian sampleen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.description.versionacceptedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2020 The Editors of Nordic Psychologyen_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextpostprint
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/19012276.2020.1727359
dc.identifier.cristin1811370
dc.source.journalNordic Psychologyen_US
dc.source.pagenumber331-345en_US
dc.identifier.citationNordic Psychology. 2020, 72 (4), 331-345.en_US
dc.source.volume72en_US
dc.source.issue4en_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)