Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorEnberg, Katja
dc.contributor.authorSteen, Ida Helene
dc.contributor.authorEllingsen, Ståle
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-15T12:57:23Z
dc.date.available2021-07-15T12:57:23Z
dc.date.created2021-02-26T09:59:41Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.issn2535-4574
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2764554
dc.description.abstractExtended use of laboratory and field courses makes biology a discipline considering itself as a habitual practitioner of active learning strategies. We investigated how widely the faculty at the Department of Biological Sciences (BIO) at the University of Bergen (UiB) uses active learning methods. 36 members of the teaching staff answered our web-based questionnaire, and we carried out in-depth interviews of 7 faculty members. Our results show that almost all BIO-teachers use at least some active learning methods, and plan to use them in their teaching in the near future. The teachers use active learning methods mostly because they want their students to achieve deeper learning, but also because they want to develop themselves as teachers. This selfmotivation is obvious, as over 90% of the teachers identified self-motivation as the strongest incentive, while colleagues, the department, and the university were less important. A vast majority of the teachers also think that it is their own responsibility to take in use active learning methods, while fewer faculty members assume institutional responsibility from BIO. The major bottlenecks identified were large class size and difficulties related to evaluating and grading student performance when using active learning methods. The teachers would use more active learning methods if the availability of active learning rooms was increased. Our in-depth interviews suggest that the most suitable time window for adopting more student-active learning methods is either when new courses are established, or when teachers are taking over courses new to them. We therefore suggest that if educational institutes wish to increase the proportion of active teaching methods, they should provide extra support in such transition periods.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherNTNU Norwegian University of Science and Technologyen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleMe, myself and I -Teachers’ self-motivation and sense of responsibility determine the use of active learning methodsen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright the authorsen_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.doi10.5324/njsteme.v3i1.2992
dc.identifier.cristin1893940
dc.source.journalNordic Journal of STEM Educationen_US
dc.source.pagenumber55-59en_US
dc.identifier.citationNordic Journal of STEM Education. 2019, 3 (1), 55-59.en_US
dc.source.volume3en_US
dc.source.issue1en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal