Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLamprecht, Anna-Lena
dc.contributor.authorPalmblad, Magnus
dc.contributor.authorIson, Jon
dc.contributor.authorSchwämmle, Veit
dc.contributor.authorAl Manir, Mohammad Sadnan
dc.contributor.authorAltintas, Ilkay
dc.contributor.authorBaker, Christopher J. O.
dc.contributor.authorBen Hadj Amor, Ammar
dc.contributor.authorCapella-Gutierrez, Salvador
dc.contributor.authorCharonyktakis, Paulos
dc.contributor.authorCrusoe, Michael R.
dc.contributor.authorGil, Yolanda
dc.contributor.authorGoble, Carole
dc.contributor.authorGriffin, Timothy J.
dc.contributor.authorGroth, Paul
dc.contributor.authorIenasescu, Hans
dc.contributor.authorJagtap, Pratik
dc.contributor.authorKalaš, Matúš
dc.contributor.authorKasalica, Vedran
dc.contributor.authorKhanteymoori, Alireza
dc.contributor.authorKuhn, Tobias
dc.contributor.authorMei, Hailiang
dc.contributor.authorMénager, Hervé
dc.contributor.authorMöller, Steffen
dc.contributor.authorRichardson, Robin A.
dc.contributor.authorRobert, Vincent
dc.contributor.authorSoiland-Reyes, Stian
dc.contributor.authorStevens, Robert
dc.contributor.authorSzaniszlo, Szoke
dc.contributor.authorVerberne, Suzan
dc.contributor.authorVerhoeven, Aswin
dc.contributor.authorWolstencroft, Katherine
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-02T10:39:29Z
dc.date.available2022-02-02T10:39:29Z
dc.date.created2021-12-02T13:24:21Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.issn2046-1402
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2976629
dc.description.abstractScientific data analyses often combine several computational tools in automated pipelines, or workflows. Thousands of such workflows have been used in the life sciences, though their composition has remained a cumbersome manual process due to a lack of standards for annotation, assembly, and implementation. Recent technological advances have returned the long-standing vision of automated workflow composition into focus. This article summarizes a recent Lorentz Center workshop dedicated to automated composition of workflows in the life sciences. We survey previous initiatives to automate the composition process, and discuss the current state of the art and future perspectives. We start by drawing the “big picture” of the scientific workflow development life cycle, before surveying and discussing current methods, technologies and practices for semantic domain modelling, automation in workflow development, and workflow assessment. Finally, we derive a roadmap of individual and community-based actions to work toward the vision of automated workflow development in the forthcoming years. A central outcome of the workshop is a general description of the workflow life cycle in six stages: 1) scientific question or hypothesis, 2) conceptual workflow, 3) abstract workflow, 4) concrete workflow, 5) production workflow, and 6) scientific results. The transitions between stages are facilitated by diverse tools and methods, usually incorporating domain knowledge in some form. Formal semantic domain modelling is hard and often a bottleneck for the application of semantic technologies. However, life science communities have made considerable progress here in recent years and are continuously improving, renewing interest in the application of semantic technologies for workflow exploration, composition and instantiation. Combined with systematic benchmarking with reference data and large-scale deployment of production-stage workflows, such technologies enable a more systematic process of workflow development than we know today. We believe that this can lead to more robust, reusable, and sustainable workflows in the future.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherF1000Researchen_US
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.54159.1
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.subjectBeregningsvitenskapen_US
dc.subjectComputational Scienceen_US
dc.subjectLivsvitenskapen_US
dc.subjectLife Scienceen_US
dc.titlePerspectives on automated composition of workflows in the life sciences [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]en_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2021 the authorsen_US
dc.source.articlenumber897en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.doi10.12688/f1000research.54159.1
dc.identifier.cristin1963438
dc.source.journalF1000 Researchen_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Kunnskapsbaserte systemer: 425en_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Knowledge-based systems: 425en_US
dc.identifier.citationF1000 Research. 2021, 10, 897.en_US
dc.source.volume10en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal