Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorHelldén, Daniel
dc.contributor.authorHöök, Susanna Myrnerts
dc.contributor.authorPejovic, Nicolas
dc.contributor.authorMcLellan, Dan
dc.contributor.authorLubulwa, Clare
dc.contributor.authorTylleskär, Thorkild
dc.contributor.authorAlfvén, Tobias
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-04T07:35:02Z
dc.date.available2022-02-04T07:35:02Z
dc.date.created2021-10-06T09:44:59Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.issn2399-9772
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2977018
dc.description.abstractBackground Neonatal mortality, often due to birth asphyxia, remains stubbornly high in sub-Saharan Africa. Guidelines for neonatal resuscitation, where achieving adequate positive pressure ventilation (PPV) is key, have been implemented in low-resource settings. However, the actual clinical practices of neonatal resuscitation have rarely been examined in these settings. The primary aim of this prospective observational study was to detail the cumulative proportion of time with ventilation during the first minute on the resuscitation table of neonates needing PPV at the Mulago National Referral Hospital in Kampala, Uganda. Methods From November 2015 to January 2016, resuscitations of non-breathing neonates by birth attendants were video-recorded using motion sensor cameras. The resuscitation practices were analysed using the application NeoTapAS and compared between those taking place in the labour ward and those in theatre through Fisher’s exact test and Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Results From 141 recorded resuscitations, 99 were included for analysis. The time to initiation of PPV was 66 (42–102) s overall, and there was minimal PPV during the first minute in both groups with 0 (0–10) s and 0 (0–12) s of PPV, respectively. After initiating PPV the overall duration of interruptions during the first minute was 28 (18–37) s. Majority of interruptions were caused by stimulation (28%), unknown reasons (25%) and suction (22%). Conclusions Our findings show a low adherence to standard resuscitation practices in 2015–2016. This emphasises the need for continuous educational efforts and investments in staff and adequate resources to increase the quality of clinical neonatal resuscitation practices in low-resource settings.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherBMJ Publishing Groupen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleNeonatal resuscitation practices in Uganda: a video observational studyen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022.en_US
dc.source.articlenumbere001092en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/bmjpo-2021-001092
dc.identifier.cristin1943663
dc.source.journalBMJ Paediatrics Openen_US
dc.identifier.citationBMJ Paediatrics Open. 2021, 5, e001092.en_US
dc.source.volume5en_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal