Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorKliem, Daniel
dc.contributor.authorScheidegger, Alexander
dc.contributor.authorKopainsky, Birgit
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-18T14:39:33Z
dc.date.available2022-03-18T14:39:33Z
dc.date.created2021-09-16T11:12:26Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.issn0921-3449
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2986260
dc.description.abstractConstruction and demolition waste (CDW) constitutes a highly voluminous urban waste stream with significant potential for circular mineral construction material usage. This paper uses participatory system dynamics modeling with relevant actors from different public policy and industry sectors to a) to identify structural barriers to the uptake of secondary resource utilization; b) design and test policies administrative (spatial planning, ownership), fiscal (extraction levy, disposal fee) and soft (lighthouse projects) policies and c) discuss the feasibility of implementing these with policies in the political and legislative context of Switzerland. We find practice relevant policy insights, such as the role of distributed control of land use policies resulting in a co-evolutionary lock-in to primary resources consumptions. Policy interventions need to establish new forms of collaboration between regional actors, as hinterland are specializing as resource suppliers for urban regions. Without coordinated interventions that address structural imbalances of material flow, arbitrage effects with other regions render policies ineffective. From a methodological perspective we find that simulation and participatory modeling improves the efficacy of transition interventions as we provide a structural problem analysis as a tool for Stakeholder reflexivity.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleClosing the mineral construction material cycle – An endogenous perspective on barriers in transitionen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2021 the authorsen_US
dc.source.articlenumber105859en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105859
dc.identifier.cristin1934825
dc.source.journalResources, Conservation and Recyclingen_US
dc.identifier.citationResources, Conservation and Recycling. 2021, 175, 105859.en_US
dc.source.volume175en_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal