Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorChang, Jie
dc.contributor.authorGe, Ying
dc.contributor.authorWu, Zhaoping
dc.contributor.authorDu, Yuanyuan
dc.contributor.authorPan, Kaixuan
dc.contributor.authorYang, Guofu
dc.contributor.authorRen, Yuan
dc.contributor.authorHeino, Mikko Petteri
dc.contributor.authorMao, Feng
dc.contributor.authorCheong, Kang Hao
dc.contributor.authorQu, Zelong
dc.contributor.authorFan, Xing
dc.contributor.authorMin, Yong
dc.contributor.authorPeng, Changhui
dc.contributor.authorMeyerson, Laura A.
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-05T09:12:05Z
dc.date.available2022-04-05T09:12:05Z
dc.date.created2021-06-04T16:32:04Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.issn0265-9247
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2989854
dc.description.abstractThe structure and “metabolism” (movement and conversion of goods and energy) of urban areas has caused cities to be identified as “super-organisms”, placed between ecosystems and the biosphere, in the hierarchy of living systems. Yet most such analogies are weak, and render the super-organism model ineffective for sustainable development of cities. Via a cluster analysis of 15 shared traits of the hierarchical living system, we found that industrialized cities are more similar to eukaryotic cells than to multicellular organisms; enclosed systems, such as factories and greenhouses, paralleling organelles in eukaryotic cells. We further developed a “super-cell” industrialized city model: a “eukarcity” with citynucleus (urban area) as a regulating centre, and organaras (enclosed systems, which provide the majority of goods and services) as the functional components, and cityplasm (natural ecosystems and farmlands) as the matrix. This model may improve the vitality and sustainability of cities through planning and management.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse-Ikkekommersiell 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleModern cities modelled as “super-cells” rather than multicellular organisms: Implications for industry, goods and servicesen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2021 The Author(s)en_US
dc.source.articlenumber2100041en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/bies.202100041
dc.identifier.cristin1913831
dc.source.journalBioessaysen_US
dc.identifier.citationBioessays. 2021, 43(7), 2100041.en_US
dc.source.volume43en_US
dc.source.issue7en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Navngivelse-Ikkekommersiell 4.0 Internasjonal
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Navngivelse-Ikkekommersiell 4.0 Internasjonal