Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorMarkussen, Dagfinn Lunde
dc.contributor.authorGrewal, Harleen
dc.contributor.authorKnoop, Siri Tandberg
dc.contributor.authorSerigstad, Sondre
dc.contributor.authorKommedal, Øyvind
dc.contributor.authorEbbesen, Marit Helen
dc.contributor.authorUlvestad, Elling
dc.contributor.authorBjørneklett, Rune Oskar
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-08T08:26:29Z
dc.date.available2022-06-08T08:26:29Z
dc.date.created2022-05-20T09:43:37Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.issn2374-4235
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2997825
dc.description.abstractBackground Respiratory tract infections (RTIs) caused by contagious viruses are common among patients presenting to the emergency department (ED). Early detection of these viruses can help prevent nosocomial transmission. Aim To investigate the efficacy of three rapid molecular methods, namely FilmArray® Pneumonia Panel plus (FAP plus), ID NOW™ Influenza A and B 2 (ID NOW2) point-of-care test, and an in-house real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test, to identify patients with viral RTIs requiring isolation in an emergency setting. Methods We included a FilmArray® Pneumonia Panel plus in the initial workup of patients with suspected RTIs during a flu season. The RT-PCR and the influenza point-of-care test were performed as part of routine diagnostics, on demand from the treating physicians. We compared viral detections and compared time to positive test results for each method. Findings The FAP plus significantly reduced the turnaround time and was able to identify 95% patients with potential contagious viral RTI. Routine diagnostics ordered by the treating physician had a turnaround time of a median 22 h and detected 87% of patients with potential contagious viral RTI. In patients that had all three tests, the ID NOW2 detected 62% of patients with influenza. Conclusions The FAP plus was able to rapidly and reliably identify patients with potential contagious viral RTIs; its use was feasible in the ED setting. Failing to test patients with viral RTI and using tests with long turnaround time may lead to nosocomial transmission of viral infections and adverse patient outcomes.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherTaylor & Francisen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleComparison of rapid molecular testing methods for detecting respiratory viruses in emergency care: a prospective studyen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2021 The Author(s)en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/23744235.2021.2003857
dc.identifier.cristin2025872
dc.source.journalInfectious Diseasesen_US
dc.source.pagenumber247-254en_US
dc.identifier.citationInfectious Diseases. 2022, 54 (4), 247-254.en_US
dc.source.volume54en_US
dc.source.issue4en_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal