Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorBanitalebi, Hasan
dc.contributor.authorEspeland, Ansgar
dc.contributor.authorAnvar, Masoud D
dc.contributor.authorHermansen, Erland
dc.contributor.authorHellum, Christian
dc.contributor.authorBrox, Jens Ivar
dc.contributor.authorMyklebust, Tor Åge
dc.contributor.authorIndrekvam, Kari
dc.contributor.authorBrisby, Helena
dc.contributor.authorWeber, Clemens
dc.contributor.authorAaen, Jørn Ståle
dc.contributor.authorAustevoll, Ivar Magne
dc.contributor.authorGrundnes, Oliver
dc.contributor.authorNegård, Anne
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-10T07:32:56Z
dc.date.available2022-06-10T07:32:56Z
dc.date.created2022-04-11T14:12:54Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.issn1471-2474
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2998237
dc.description.abstractBackground Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is an important tool in preoperative evaluation of patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). Reported reliability of various MRI findings in LSS varies from fair to excellent. There are inconsistencies in the evaluated parameters and the methodology of the studies. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reliability of the preoperative MRI findings in patients with LSS between musculoskeletal radiologists and orthopaedic spine surgeons, using established evaluation methods and imaging data from a prospective trial. Methods Consecutive lumbar MRI examinations of candidates for surgical treatment of LSS from the Norwegian Spinal Stenosis and Degenerative Spondylolisthesis (NORDSTEN) study were independently evaluated by two musculoskeletal radiologists and two orthopaedic spine surgeons. The observers had a range of experience between six and 13 years and rated five categorical parameters (foraminal and central canal stenosis, facet joint osteoarthritis, redundant nerve roots and intraspinal synovial cysts) and one continuous parameter (dural sac cross-sectional area). All parameters were re-rated after 6 weeks by all the observers. Inter- and intraobserver agreement was assessed by Gwet’s agreement coefficient (AC1) for categorical parameters and Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) for the dural sac cross-sectional area. Results MRI examinations of 102 patients (mean age 66 ± 8 years, 53 men) were evaluated. The overall interobserver agreement was substantial or almost perfect for all categorical parameters (AC1 range 0.67 to 0.98), except for facet joint osteoarthritis, where the agreement was moderate (AC1 0.39). For the dural sac cross-sectional area, the overall interobserver agreement was good or excellent (ICC range 0.86 to 0.96). The intraobserver agreement was substantial or almost perfect/ excellent for all parameters (AC1 range 0.63 to 1.0 and ICC range 0.93 to 1.0). Conclusions There is high inter- and intraobserver agreement between radiologists and spine surgeons for preoperative MRI findings of LSS. However, the interobserver agreement is not optimal for evaluation of facet joint osteoarthritis.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherBioMed Centralen_US
dc.relation.urihttps://bmcmusculoskeletdisord.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12891-021-04949-4
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleReliability of preoperative MRI findings in patients with lumbar spinal stenosisen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2022 The Author(s)en_US
dc.source.articlenumber51en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12891-021-04949-4
dc.identifier.cristin2016760
dc.source.journalBMC Musculoskeletal Disordersen_US
dc.identifier.citationBMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2022, 23, 51.en_US
dc.source.volume23en_US
dc.source.issue1en_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal