Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorHaarstad, Håvard
dc.contributor.authorSareen, Siddharth
dc.contributor.authorKandt, Jens
dc.contributor.authorCoenen, Lars Martel Antoine
dc.contributor.authorCook, Matthew
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-25T13:37:05Z
dc.date.available2022-10-25T13:37:05Z
dc.date.created2022-10-19T12:34:18Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.issn0301-4215
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3028229
dc.description.abstractAutomobility, including the infrastructures, technologies and institutions that created high dependence on private car use, has led to significant environmental and climate problems and notably high carbon emissions. Now cities are attempting to move beyond this failed regime by experimenting with a range of different mobility innovations. In this paper, we examine whether emergent policy-led experiments and innovation processes in low-carbon mobility are learning from the past, or whether they are reproducing key elements of past policy failures. Through four case studies – Birmingham, Stavanger, Milton Keynes and Melbourne – we assess attempts to break out of high-carbon automobility through three key factors, namely diversification of travel options, a shift from individual to shared forms of mobility, and whether these aspects are implemented at scale. We find that while all cities show potential for diversification and sharing at scale, current modes of innovation exhibit features that may reproduce rather than reduce high-carbon automobility. Our analysis attributes this risk of continued failure to how policy-led experimentation and innovation are structured and themselves become locked in, thereby upholding the obdurate automobility regime.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleBeyond automobility? Lock-in of past failures in low-carbon urban mobility innovationsen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2022 the authorsen_US
dc.source.articlenumber113002en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.enpol.2022.113002
dc.identifier.cristin2062763
dc.source.journalEnergy Policyen_US
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 321421
dc.identifier.citationEnergy Policy. 2022, 166, 113002.en_US
dc.source.volume166en_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal