Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorKähnert, Marvin
dc.contributor.authorSodemann, Harald
dc.contributor.authorRemes, Teresa Maaria
dc.contributor.authorFortelius, Carl
dc.contributor.authorBazile, Eric
dc.contributor.authorEsau, Igor
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-29T14:40:36Z
dc.date.available2022-12-29T14:40:36Z
dc.date.created2022-11-24T13:19:18Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.issn0006-8314
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3039940
dc.description.abstractForecast errors in near-surface temperatures are a persistent issue for numerical weather prediction models. A prominent example is warm biases during cloud-free, snow-covered nights. Many studies attribute these biases to parametrized processes such as turbulence or radiation. Here, we focus on the contribution of physical processes to the nocturnal temperature development. We compare model timestep output of individual tendencies from parametrized processes in the weather prediction model AROME-Arctic to measurements from Sodankylä, Finland. Thereby, we differentiate between the weakly stable boundary layer (wSBL) and the very stable boundary layer (vSBL) regimes. The wSBL is characterized by continuous turbulent exchange within the near-surface atmosphere, causing near-neutral temperature profiles. The vSBL is characterized by a decoupling of the lowermost model level, low turbulent exchange, and very stable temperature profiles. In our case study, both regimes occur simultaneously on small spatial scales of about 5 km. In addition, we demonstrate the model’s sensitivity towards an updated surface treatment, allowing for faster surface cooling. The updated surface parametrization has profound impacts on parametrized processes in both regimes. However, only modelled temperatures in the vSBL are impacted substantially, whereas more efficient surface cooling in the wSBL is compensated by an increased turbulent heat transport within the boundary layer. This study demonstrates the utility of individual tendencies for understanding process-related differences between model configurations and emphasizes the need for model studies to distinguish between the wSBL and vSBL for reliable model verification.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleSpatial variability of nocturnal stability regimes in an operational weather prediction modelen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2022 the authorsen_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10546-022-00762-1
dc.identifier.cristin2080100
dc.source.journalBoundary-Layer Meteorologyen_US
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 280573en_US
dc.identifier.citationBoundary-Layer Meteorology. 2022.en_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal