Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCazzolla Gatti, Roberto
dc.contributor.authorZannini, Piero
dc.contributor.authorPiovesan, Gianluca
dc.contributor.authorAlessi, Nicola
dc.contributor.authorBasset, Alberto
dc.contributor.authorBeierkuhnlein, Carl
dc.contributor.authorDi Musciano, Michele
dc.contributor.authorField, Richard
dc.contributor.authorHalley, John M.
dc.contributor.authorHoffmann, Samuel
dc.contributor.authorIaria, Jacopo
dc.contributor.authorKallimanis, Athanasios
dc.contributor.authorLövei, Gabor L.
dc.contributor.authorMorera, Albert
dc.contributor.authorProvenzale, Antonello
dc.contributor.authorRocchini, Duccio
dc.contributor.authorVetaas, Ole Reidar
dc.contributor.authorChiarucci, Alessandro
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-09T11:18:10Z
dc.date.available2024-08-09T11:18:10Z
dc.date.created2023-07-11T09:35:14Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.issn0960-3115
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3145579
dc.description.abstractProtecting global biodiversity is one of the most urgent tasks for the coming decades. Area-based conservation is a pillar for preserving ecosystems and species. Strictly protected areas specifically preserve biodiversity and ecosystem processes. The “EU Biodiversity Strategy for 2030” targets strict protection for 10% of land area. Here we performed the first analysis of strictly protected areas (as IUCN type Ia, Ib, and II) across Europe, by investigating their area coverage at the level of biogeographical regions, countries and elevation gradients. We show that, with few exceptions, the amount of strictly protected area is very limited and the spatial distribution of such protected areas is biased towards higher elevation sites, as in the case of other protected areas. Then, we suggest that potential areas should be identified to expand strictly protected areas with low economic and social costs including, for instance, areas with high biodiversity value, low population, and low productive land use. Finally, we propose that a coordinated effort and a strategic plan to achieve continental-scale conservation are fundamental, and at least half of this land under strict conservation (i.e. 5%) should be under the protection categories Ia and Ib.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleAnalysing the distribution of strictly protected areas toward the EU2030 targeten_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2023 The Author(s)en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10531-023-02644-5
dc.identifier.cristin2161849
dc.source.journalBiodiversity and Conservationen_US
dc.source.pagenumber3157–3174en_US
dc.identifier.citationBiodiversity and Conservation. 2023, 32, 3157–3174.en_US
dc.source.volume32en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal