Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorNilssen, Yngvar
dc.contributor.authorBrustugun, Odd Terje
dc.contributor.authorFjellbirkeland, Lars
dc.contributor.authorGrønberg, Bjørn Henning
dc.contributor.authorHaram, Per Magnus
dc.contributor.authorHelbekkmo, Nina
dc.contributor.authorHelland, Åslaug
dc.contributor.authorWahl, Sissel Gyrid Freim
dc.contributor.authorAanerud, Marianne
dc.contributor.authorSolberg, Steinar
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-04T10:39:47Z
dc.date.available2024-11-04T10:39:47Z
dc.date.created2024-05-14T11:31:33Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifier.issn1525-7304
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3163169
dc.description.abstractIntroduction/Background There has been a marked survival improvement for patients with non–small-cell lung cancer. We describe the national trends in characteristics and survival, and geographical differences in diagnostic workup, treatment, and survival for patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). Materials and Methods Patients registered with SCLC at the Cancer Registry of Norway in 2002 to 2022 were included. Trends in overall survival were estimated for all SCLC patients, patients with limited stage SCLC, patients undergoing surgery, and by health region. Adjusting for case-mix, a multivariable Cox regression was performed examining the association between health region and death. Results The study included 8374 patients. The stage distribution remained unchanged during the study period. The 5-year overall survival increased from 7.7% to 22.8% for patients with limited stage. The use of multidisciplinary team meetings varied from 62.5% to 85.7%, and the use of positron emission tomography-computer tomography varied from 70.4% to 86.2% between the health regions. Treatment patterns differed markedly between the health regions, with the proportion dying without any registered treatment ranging from 1.2% to 10.9%. For limited stage patients in 2018 to 2022, the median overall survival ranged from 16.5 to 25.5 months across health regions, and the 5-year overall survival ranged from 18.7% to 28.7% (P = .019). Conclusion The survival for patients with SCLC remains poor. The use of diagnostic procedures, treatment modalities, and survival differed between regions, warranting investigations to further explore the reasons.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleSmall Cell Lung Cancer in Norway: Patterns of Care by Health Region and Survival Trendsen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2024 The Author(s)en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.cllc.2024.04.002
dc.identifier.cristin2268458
dc.source.journalClinical Lung Canceren_US
dc.source.pagenumbere221-e228en_US
dc.identifier.citationClinical Lung Cancer. 2024, 25 (5), e221-e228.en_US
dc.source.volume25en_US
dc.source.issue5en_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal