• norsk
    • English
  • English 
    • norsk
    • English
  • Login
View Item 
  •   Home
  • Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences
  • Department of Earth Science
  • Department of Earth Science
  • View Item
  •   Home
  • Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences
  • Department of Earth Science
  • Department of Earth Science
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Seismic hazard in Norway due to large earthquakes

Johnsen, Martine
Master thesis
Thumbnail
View/Open
135270766.pdf (9.632Mb)
URI
https://hdl.handle.net/1956/10269
Date
2015-06-01
Metadata
Show full item record
Collections
  • Department of Earth Science [836]
Abstract
There are many faults located in Norway, posing as potential earthquake sources. Even though the seismicity is characterized as low to moderate, earthquakes of magnitude 3.5 or lower occur regularly. The seismic hazard following such a small event is very low; however, the occurrence of small earthquakes may promote the possibility of larger events. This thesis is based on the potential seismic hazard in Norway due to large earthquakes, and this study performs simulations of three or four different earthquake scenarios on 13 faults located in Norway, in areas where cities and towns are situated nearby, and these magnitudes are: the highest possible magnitude for each fault based on the fault length (ranges from MW 7.7 to MW 6.9), MW 7.0, MW 6.5 and MW 6.0. The simulations show the expected ground motion in peak ground acceleration (PGA), and the PGA caused by the earthquake scenarios are quite high, with a maximum of 317.6 cm/s2. This could correspond to shaking of intensity VIII on the Modified Mercalli Intensity Scale. The MW 6.5 and MW 6.0 scenarios would result in PGA between 191.4 and 91.11 cm/s2, which may indicate intensity VI - VII. The area outside the 50 cm/s2 contour line would be exposed to PGA below 50 cm/s2 and the shaking in this area could correspond to intensity IV - VI. A stochastic simulation code, EXSIM12, was used in performing these simulations. The difference in maximum PGA for scenarios of similar magnitude shows that the distribution of the PGA and the maximum value are dependent on several factors, for example the length and width of the fault, as well as the number of iterations per site, and whether the simulations are performed with random or fixed hypocenter location. Both increasing the number of iterations per site and changing from random to fixed hypocenter location result in smoother distribution of the PGA and lower maximum value for the earthquake scenarios.
Publisher
The University of Bergen

Contact Us | Send Feedback

Privacy policy
DSpace software copyright © 2002-2019  DuraSpace

Service from  Unit
 

 

Browse

ArchiveCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsDocument TypesJournalsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsDocument TypesJournals

My Account

Login

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

Contact Us | Send Feedback

Privacy policy
DSpace software copyright © 2002-2019  DuraSpace

Service from  Unit