Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBrendbekken, Randi
dc.contributor.authorHarris, Anette
dc.contributor.authorUrsin, Holger
dc.contributor.authorEriksen, Hege Randi
dc.contributor.authorTangen, Tone
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-11T09:04:09Z
dc.date.available2015-12-11T09:04:09Z
dc.date.issued2016-02
dc.PublishedInternational Journal of Behavioral Medicine 2016, 23(1):1-11.eng
dc.identifier.issn1532-7558
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1956/10741
dc.description.abstractBackground Musculoskeletal pain is associated with comorbidity, extensive use of health services, long-term disability and reduced quality of life. The scientific literature on effects of treatment for musculoskeletal pain is inconclusive. Purpose The purpose of this study is to compare a multidisciplinary intervention (MI), including use of the novel Interdisciplinary Structured Interview with a Visual Educational Tool (ISIVET), with a brief intervention (BI), on effects on mental and physical symptoms, functioning ability, use of health services and coping in patients sick-listed due to musculoskeletal pain. Method Two hundred eighty-four adults aged 18–60, referred to a specialist clinic in physical rehabilitation, were randomized to MI or BI. Patients received a medical examination at baseline and completed a comprehensive questionnaire at baseline, 3 months and 12 months. Results Both groups reported improvements in mental and physical symptoms, including pain, and improved functioning ability at 3 and 12 months, but the MI group improved faster than the BI group except from reports of pain, which had a similar course. Significant interactions between group and time were found on mental symptoms (anxiety (p < 0.05), depression (p < 0.01), somatization (p < 0.01)) and functioning ability (p < 0.01) due to stronger effects in the MI group at 3 months. At 3 and 12 months, the MI group reported significantly less use of health services (general practitioner (p < 0.05)). At 12 months, the MI group reported better self-evaluated capability of coping with complaints (p < 0.001) and they took better care of their own health (p < 0.001), compared to the BI group. Conclusion The results indicate that the MI may represent an important supplement in the treatment of musculoskeletal pain.en_US
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherSpringereng
dc.rightsAttribution CC BYeng
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0eng
dc.subjectRandomized clinical trialeng
dc.subjectChronic musculoskeletal paineng
dc.subjectMultidisciplinary treatmenteng
dc.titleMultidisciplinary intervention in patients with musculoskeletal pain: a randomized clinical trialeng
dc.typePeer reviewed
dc.typeJournal article
dc.date.updated2015-11-06T09:38:43Z
dc.description.versionpublishedVersion
dc.rights.holderCopyright The Author(s) 2015eng
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s12529-015-9486-y
dc.identifier.cristin1243977
dc.relation.projectSykehuset Innlandet HF: 150231
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Medisinske Fag: 700
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Medisinske fag: 700::Klinisk medisinske fag: 750::Fysikalsk medisin og rehabilitering: 764
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Midical sciences: 700::Clinical medical sciences: 750::Physical medicine and rehabilitation: 764
dc.subject.keywordArbeid og helse / Working life and health
dc.subject.keywordMuskelskjelettsmerter / Musculoskeletal pain
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Behavioral Medicine. 2016, 23 (1), 1-11


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution CC BY
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution CC BY