Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorKessler, Uteen_US
dc.contributor.authorSchøyen, Helle Kristineen_US
dc.contributor.authorAndreassen, Ole Andreasen_US
dc.contributor.authorEide, Geir Egilen_US
dc.contributor.authorHammar, Åsaen_US
dc.contributor.authorMalt, Ulrik Fredriken_US
dc.contributor.authorØdegaard, Ketil Joachimen_US
dc.contributor.authorMorken, Gunnaren_US
dc.contributor.authorSundet, Kjetil Sørenen_US
dc.contributor.authorVaaler, Arne Einaren_US
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-16T13:43:16Z
dc.date.available2015-12-16T13:43:16Z
dc.date.issued2013-04-04
dc.PublishedBMC Psychiatry 2013, 13eng
dc.identifier.issn1471-244X
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1956/10760
dc.description.abstractBackground The literature on the neuropsychological profiles in Bipolar disorder (BD) depression is sparse. The aims of the study were to assess the neurocognitive profiles in treatment-resistant, acutely admitted BD depression inpatients, to compare the neurocognitive functioning in patients with BD I and II, and to identify the demographic and clinical illness characteristics associated with cognitive functioning. Methods Acutely admitted BD I (n = 19) and BD II (n = 32) inpatients who fulfilled the DSM-IV-TR criteria for a major depressive episode were tested with the MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB), the Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence, the National Adult Reading Test, and a battery of clinical measures. Results Neurocognitive impairments were evident in the BD I and BD II depression inpatients within all MCCB domains. The numerical scores on all MCCB-measures were lower in the BD I group than in the BD II group, with a significant difference on one of the measures, category fluency. 68.4% of the BD I patients had clinically significant impairment (>1.5 SD below normal mean) in two or more domains compared to 37.5% of the BD II patients (p = 0.045). A significant reduction in IQ from the premorbid to the current level was seen in BD I but not BD II patients. Higher age was associated with greater neurocognitive deficits compared to age-adjusted published norms. Conclusions A high proportion of patients with therapy-resistant BD I or II depression exhibited global neurocognitive impairments with clinically significant severity. The cognitive impairments were more common in BD I compared to BD II patients, particularly processing speed. These findings suggest that clinicians should be aware of the severe neurocognitive dysfunction in treatment-resistant bipolar depression, particularly in BD I.en_US
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherBioMed Centraleng
dc.rightsAttribution CC BYeng
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0eng
dc.subjectBipolar disorder depressioneng
dc.subjectBipolar II disordereng
dc.titleNeurocognitive profiles in treatment-resistant bipolar I and bipolar II disorder depressionen_US
dc.typePeer reviewed
dc.typeJournal article
dc.date.updated2015-09-11T13:15:59Z
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright Kessler et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1186/1471-244x-13-105
dc.identifier.cristin1023736
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Medisinske fag: 700::Klinisk medisinske fag: 750::Psykiatri, barnepsykiatri: 757
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Midical sciences: 700::Clinical medical sciences: 750::Psychiatry, child psychiatry: 757
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Medisinske Fag: 700en_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Attribution CC BY
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Attribution CC BY