Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorVandvik, Vigdis
dc.contributor.authorKlanderud, Kari
dc.contributor.authorMeineri, Eric Pierre F
dc.contributor.authorMåren, Inger Elisabeth
dc.contributor.authorTöpper, Joachim Paul
dc.date.accessioned2016-04-12T12:38:24Z
dc.date.available2016-04-12T12:38:24Z
dc.date.issued2015-05-26
dc.PublishedOikos 2015, 125(2):218-228eng
dc.identifier.issn1600-0706en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1956/11900
dc.description.abstractSoil seed banks offer plants the possibility to disperse through time. This has implications for population and community dynamics, as recognised by ecological and evolutionary theory. In contrast, the conservation and restoration literature often find seed banks to be depauperate, weedy and without much conservation value or restoration potential. One explanation for these contrasting views might lie in a systematic bias in the sampling of seed banks versus established plant communities. We use the species–area relationship as a tool to assess and compare the per-area species richness and spatial structuring of the diversity of the established plant community versus soil seed banks. To allow this direct comparison we extensively survey the species–area relationship of the vegetation and underlying seed bank of a grassland community across twelve sites spanning regional bioclimatic gradients. We also compile a global dataset of established vegetation and seed banks from published sources. We find that seed banks have consistently higher intercepts and slopes of the relationship, and hence higher diversity at any given spatial scale, than the vegetation both in the field and literature study. This is consistent across habitat types, climate gradients, and biomes. Similarity indices are commonly used to compare vegetation and seed bank, and we find that sampling effort (% of the vegetation area sampled for seed bank) was the strongest predictor of vegetation–seed bank similarity for both the Sørensen (R2 = 0.70) and the Raup–Crick (R2 = 0.25) index. Our study suggests that the perception that seed banks are intrinsically less diverse than established plant communities has been based more on inadequate sampling than on biological reality. Across a range of ecosystems and climatic settings, we find high diversity in seed banks relative to the established community, suggesting potentially important roles of seed banks in population dynamics and diversity maintenance.en_US
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.rightsAttribution CC BYeng
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/eng
dc.titleSeed banks are biodiversity reservoirs: species–area relationships above versus below grounden_US
dc.typePeer reviewed
dc.typeJournal article
dc.date.updated2016-03-21T09:15:20Z
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2015 the authorsen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1111/oik.02022
dc.identifier.cristin1215458
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 184912


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution CC BY
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution CC BY