Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorEngjom, Tronden_US
dc.contributor.authorSangnes, Dag Andréen_US
dc.contributor.authorHavre, Roald Fleslanden_US
dc.contributor.authorErchinger, Friedemann Georgen_US
dc.contributor.authorPham, Khanh Do-Congen_US
dc.contributor.authorHaldorsen, Ingfrid S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorGilja, Odd Helgeen_US
dc.contributor.authorDimcevski, Georg Gjorgjien_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-08-04T12:37:30Z
dc.date.available2017-08-04T12:37:30Z
dc.date.issued2017-04
dc.PublishedEngjom T, Sangnes DA, Havre R, Erchinger F, Pham KD, Haldorsen IS, Gilja OH, Dimcevski G. Diagnostic accuracy of transabdominal ultrasound in chronic pancreatitis. Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology. 2017;43(4):735-743eng
dc.identifier.issn0301-5629
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1956/16220
dc.description.abstractThe performance of transabdominal ultrasound (US) in chronic pancreatitis (CP) following the advances in US technology made during recent decades has not been explored. Our aim in this prospective study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of modern abdominal US compared with the Mayo score in CP. One hundred thirty-four patients referred for suspected CP were included in the study. Fifty-four patients were assigned the diagnosis CP. After inclusion, transabdominal US was performed. Ductal features (calculi, dilations and caliber variations, side-branch dilations and hyper-echoic duct wall margins) and parenchymal features (calcifications, cysts, hyper-echoic foci, stranding, lobulation and honeycombing) were recorded. Features were counted and scored according to a weighting system defined at the international consensus meeting in Rosemont, Illinois (Rosemont score). Diagnostic performance indices (95% confidence interval) of US were calculated: The unweighted count of features had a sensitivity of 0.69 (0.54–0.80) and specificity of 0.97 (0.90–1). The Rosemont score had a sensitivity of 0.81 (0.69–0.91) and specificity of 0.97 (0.90–1). Exocrine pancreatic failure was most pronounced in Rosemont groups I and II (p < 0.001). We conclude that using both unweighted and weighted scores, the diagnostic accuracy of modern transabdominal US is good. The extent of pancreatic changes detected by the method is correlated with exocrine pancreatic function.en_US
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherElseviereng
dc.rightsAttribution CC BY-NC-NDeng
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/eng
dc.subjectChronic pancreatitiseng
dc.subjectTransabdominal Ultrasoundeng
dc.subjectMayo scoreeng
dc.subjectDiagnostic accuracyeng
dc.subjectSensitivityeng
dc.subjectSpecificityeng
dc.subjectExocrine pancreatic functioneng
dc.titleDiagnostic accuracy of transabdominal ultrasound in chronic pancreatitisen_US
dc.typePeer reviewed
dc.typeJournal article
dc.date.updated2017-05-10T06:59:22Z
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2016 The Author(s)
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2016.11.020
dc.identifier.cristin1467655
dc.source.journalUltrasound in Medicine and Biology


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Attribution CC BY-NC-ND
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Attribution CC BY-NC-ND