Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorForsberg, Ellen-Marie
dc.contributor.authorAnthun, Frank Otto
dc.contributor.authorBailey, Sharon
dc.contributor.authorBirchley, Giles
dc.contributor.authorBout, Henriette
dc.contributor.authorCasonato, Carlo
dc.contributor.authorFuster, Gloria González
dc.contributor.authorHeinrichs, Bert
dc.contributor.authorHorbach, Serge
dc.contributor.authorJacobsen, Ingrid
dc.contributor.authorJanssen, Jacques
dc.contributor.authorKaiser, Matthias
dc.contributor.authorLerouge, Inge
dc.contributor.authorvan der Meulen, Barend
dc.contributor.authorSarah de Rijcke, Sarah
dc.contributor.authorSaretzki, Thomas
dc.contributor.authorSutrop, Margit
dc.contributor.authorTazewell, Marta
dc.contributor.authorVarantola, Krista
dc.contributor.authorVie, Knut Jørgen
dc.contributor.authorZwart, Hub
dc.contributor.authorZöller, Mira
dc.PublishedForsberg E-M., Anthun, Bailey, Birchley, Bout, Casonato, Fuster, Heinrichs, Horbach, Jacobsen I, Janssen, Kaiser M, Lerouge, van der Meulen, Sarah de Rijcke, Saretzki, Sutrop M, Tazewell, Varantola K, Vie KJ, Zwart H, Zöller M. Working with Research Integrity—Guidance for Research Performing Organisations: The Bonn PRINTEGER Statement. Science and Engineering Ethics. 2018:24(4):1023–1034eng
dc.description.abstractThis document presents the Bonn PRINTEGER Consensus Statement: Working with Research Integrity—Guidance for research performing organisations. The aim of the statement is to complement existing instruments by focusing specifically on institutional responsibilities for strengthening integrity. It takes into account the daily challenges and organisational contexts of most researchers. The statement intends to make research integrity challenges recognisable from the work-floor perspective, providing concrete advice on organisational measures to strengthen integrity. The statement, which was concluded February 7th 2018, provides guidance on the following key issues: § 1. Providing information about research integrity § 2. Providing education, training and mentoring § 3. Strengthening a research integrity culture § 4. Facilitating open dialogue § 5. Wise incentive management § 6. Implementing quality assurance procedures § 7. Improving the work environment and work satisfaction § 8. Increasing transparency of misconduct cases § 9. Opening up research § 10. Implementing safe and effective whistle-blowing channels § 11. Protecting the alleged perpetrators § 12. Establishing a research integrity committee and appointing an ombudsperson § 13. Making explicit the applicable standards for research integrityen_US
dc.rightsAttribution CC BYeng
dc.subjectResearch integrityeng
dc.subjectResearch misconducteng
dc.subjectOrganisational responsibilitieseng
dc.subjectConsensus conferenceeng
dc.titleWorking with Research Integrity—Guidance for Research Performing Organisations: The Bonn PRINTEGER Statementeng
dc.typeJournal articleeng
dc.typePeer reviewedeng
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2018 The Author(s)eng
dc.source.journalScience and Engineering Ethics
dc.relation.projectEC/H2020: 665926

Tilhørende fil(er)


Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Attribution CC BY
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Attribution CC BY