Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBrendbekken, Randi
dc.contributor.authorEriksen, Hege Randi
dc.contributor.authorGrasdal, Astrid
dc.contributor.authorHarris, Anette
dc.contributor.authorHagen, Eli Molde
dc.contributor.authorTangen, Tone
dc.date.accessioned2019-02-06T16:15:13Z
dc.date.available2019-02-06T16:15:13Z
dc.date.issued2016-02-24
dc.PublishedBrendbekken R, Eriksen HR, Grasdal A, Harris A, Hagen EM, Tangen TT. Return to work in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain: multidisciplinary intervention versus brief intervention: a randomized clinical trial. Journal of occupational rehabilitation . 2016;27(1):82-91eng
dc.identifier.issn1053-0487
dc.identifier.issn1573-3688
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1956/19077
dc.description.abstractObjective: This randomized clinical trial was performed to compare the effect of a new multidisciplinary intervention (MI) programme to a brief intervention (BI) programme on return to work (RTW), fully and partly, at a 12-month and 24-month follow-up in patients on long-term sick leave due to musculoskeletal pain. Methods: Patients (n = 284, mean age 41.3 years, 53.9 % women) who were sick-listed with musculoskeletal pain and referred to a specialist clinic in physical rehabilitation were randomized to MI (n = 141) or BI (n = 143). The MI included the use of a visual educational tool, which facilitated patienttherapist communication and self-management. The MI also applied one more profession, more therapist time and a comprehensive focus on the psychosocial factors, particularly the working conditions, compared to a BI. The main features of the latter are a thorough medical, educational examination, a brief cognitive assessment based on the non-injury model, and a recommendation to return to normal activity as soon as possible. Results: The number of patients with full-time RTW developed similarly in the two groups. The patients receiving MI had a higher probability to partly RTW during the first 7 months of the follow-up compared to the BI-group. Conclusions: There were no differences between the groups on full-time RTW during the 24 months. However, the results indicate that MI hastens the return to work process in long-term sick leave through the increased use of partial sick leave. Trial Registration: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov with the registration number NCT01346423.en_US
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherSpringereng
dc.rightsAttribution CC BYeng
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/eng
dc.subjectReturn to workeng
dc.subjectSick leaveeng
dc.subjectChronic paineng
dc.subjectWork disabilityeng
dc.subjectCopingeng
dc.titleReturn to work in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain: multidisciplinary intervention versus brief intervention: a randomized clinical trialeng
dc.title.alternativeReturn to work in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain: multidisciplinary intervention versus brief intervention: a randomized clinical trialeng
dc.typePeer reviewed
dc.typeJournal article
dc.date.updated2018-07-30T08:51:13Z
dc.description.versionpublishedVersion
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2016 The Authorseng
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-016-9634-5
dc.identifier.cristin1343494
dc.source.journalJournal of occupational rehabilitation
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 257598
dc.relation.projectSykehuset Innlandet HF: 150231
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Medisinske fag: 700::Klinisk medisinske fag: 750::Fysikalsk medisin og rehabilitering: 764
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Midical sciences: 700::Clinical medical sciences: 750::Physical medicine and rehabilitation: 764
dc.identifier.citationJournal of occupational rehabilitation. 2017, 27, 82–91.


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution CC BY
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution CC BY