Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWathne, Jannicke Slettlien_US
dc.contributor.authorKleppe, Lars Kåre Sellanden_US
dc.contributor.authorHarthug, Stigen_US
dc.contributor.authorBlix, Hege Salvesenen_US
dc.contributor.authorNilsen, Roy Miodinien_US
dc.contributor.authorCharani, Esmitaen_US
dc.contributor.authorSmith, Ingriden_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-04-16T08:25:47Z
dc.date.available2019-04-16T08:25:47Z
dc.date.issued2018-09-10
dc.PublishedWathne JS, Kleppe LK, Harthug S, Blix HS, Nilsen RM, Charani E, Smith I. The effect of antibiotic stewardship interventions with stakeholder involvement in hospital settings: A multicentre, cluster randomized controlled intervention study. Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control. 2018;7:109eng
dc.identifier.issn2047-2994
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1956/19344
dc.description.abstractBackground: There is limited evidence from multicenter, randomized controlled studies to inform planning and implementation of antibiotic stewardship interventions in hospitals. Methods: A cluster randomized, controlled, intervention study was performed in selected specialities (infectious diseases, pulmonary medicine and gastroenterology) at three emergency care hospitals in Western Norway. Interventions applied were audit with feedback and academic detailing. Implementation strategies included co-design of interventions with stakeholders in local intervention teams and prescribers setting local targets for change in antibiotic prescribing behaviour. Primary outcome measures were adherence to national guidelines, use of broad-spectrum antibiotics and change in locally defined targets of change in prescribing behaviour. Secondary outcome measures were length of stay, 30-day readmission, in-hospital- and 30-day mortality. Results: One thousand eight hundred two patients receiving antibiotic treatment were included. Adherence to guidelines had an absolute increase from 60 to 66% for all intervention wards (p = 0.04). Effects differed across specialties and pulmonary intervention wards achieved a 14% absolute increase in adherence (p = 0.003), while no change was observed for other specialties. A pulmonary ward targeting increased use of penicillin G 2 mill IU × 4 for pneumonia and COPD exacerbations had an intended increase of 30% for this prescribing behaviour (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Pulmonary wards had a higher increase in adherence, independent of applied intervention. The effect of antibiotic stewardship interventions is dependent on how and in which context they are implemented. Additional effects of interventions are seen when stakeholders discuss ward prescribing behaviour and agree on specific targets for changes in prescribing practice.en_US
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherBioMed Centraleng
dc.rightsAttribution CC BYeng
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0eng
dc.subjectAntibiotic stewardshipeng
dc.subjectInterventioneng
dc.subjectcRCTeng
dc.subjectAudit with feedbackeng
dc.subjectAcademic detailingeng
dc.subjectHospitaleng
dc.subjectGoal settingeng
dc.titleThe effect of antibiotic stewardship interventions with stakeholder involvement in hospital settings: A multicentre, cluster randomized controlled intervention studyen_US
dc.typePeer reviewed
dc.typeJournal article
dc.date.updated2018-09-28T07:56:11Z
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2018 The Authors
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s13756-018-0400-7
dc.identifier.cristin1613484
dc.source.journalAntimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution CC BY
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution CC BY