Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHaugaa, Kristinaen_US
dc.contributor.authorPotpara, Tatjana S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorBoveda, Sergeen_US
dc.contributor.authorDeharo, Jean-Claudeen_US
dc.contributor.authorChen, Jianen_US
dc.contributor.authorDobreanu, Danen_US
dc.contributor.authorFumagalli, Stefanoen_US
dc.contributor.authorLenarczyk, Radoslawen_US
dc.contributor.authorHernandez Madrid, Antonioen_US
dc.contributor.authorLarsen, Torben Bjerregaarden_US
dc.contributor.authorSciarrafia, Elenaen_US
dc.contributor.authorTaborsky, Milosen_US
dc.contributor.authorTilz, Roland Richarden_US
dc.contributor.authorPieragnoli, Paoloen_US
dc.contributor.authorPrzybylski, Andrzejen_US
dc.contributor.authorDagres, Nikolaosen_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-06-20T12:27:00Z
dc.date.available2019-06-20T12:27:00Z
dc.date.issued2018-02
dc.PublishedHaugaa KH, Potpara TS, Boveda S, Deharo J, Chen J, Dobreanu D, Fumagalli S, Lenarczyk R, Hernandez Madrid, Larsen TB, Sciarrafia, Taborsky, Tilz RR, Pieragnoli, Przybylski, Dagres N. Patients' knowledge and attitudes regarding living with implantable electronic devices: Results of a multicentre, multinational patient survey conducted by the European Heart Rhythm Association. Europace. 2018;20(2):386-391eng
dc.identifier.issn1532-2092
dc.identifier.issn1099-5129
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1956/20290
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this patient survey was to analyse the knowledge, experiences, and attitudes regarding cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) in patients with pacemakers, implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs), or cardiac resynchronization devices. Of the 1644 patients with CIEDs from seven European countries, 88% were over 50 years of age. Most patients (90%) knew what device they were implanted with and felt sufficiently informed about the indications for therapy. As many as 42% of patients needed additional information on the battery replacement and limitations in physical activity. The self-reported incidence of complications was 9%, and among these, a quarter of the respondents felt insufficiently informed about the possibility of complications and their management. The majority of patients (83%) were followed by face-to-face visits, which was the most commonly preferred follow-up strategy by the patients. Nearly 75% of the patients reported improved quality of life after device implantation, but about 40% had worries about their device. Less than 20% had discussed with their physician or thought about device handling in the end-of-life circumstances or end-stage disease. Notably, almost 20% of the ICD patients did not wish to answer the question regarding what they wanted to be done with their ICD in case of end-stage disease, indicating the challenges in approaching these issues.en_US
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherOxford University Presseng
dc.subjectCardiac implantable electronic deviceseng
dc.subjectPacemakereng
dc.subjectImplantable cardioverter-defibrillatoreng
dc.subjectCardiac resynchronization therapyeng
dc.subjectPatient preferenceeng
dc.subjectPatient knowledgeeng
dc.subjectComplicationseng
dc.subjectEHRA surveyeng
dc.titlePatients' knowledge and attitudes regarding living with implantable electronic devices: Results of a multicentre, multinational patient survey conducted by the European Heart Rhythm Associationen_US
dc.typePeer reviewed
dc.typeJournal article
dc.date.updated2019-02-04T15:04:44Z
dc.description.versionacceptedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2017 The Author(s)
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1093/europace/eux365
dc.identifier.cristin1586193
dc.source.journalEuropace


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record