Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWiest, Johannes
dc.contributor.authorOsmundsen, Per Terje
dc.contributor.authorJacobs, Joachim
dc.contributor.authorFossen, Haakon
dc.date.accessioned2020-05-04T07:01:13Z
dc.date.available2020-05-04T07:01:13Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.PublishedWiest, Osmundsen, Jacobs, Fossen. Deep Crustal Flow Within Postorogenic Metamorphic Core Complexes: Insights From the Southern Western Gneiss Region of Norway. Tectonics. 2019;38(12):4267-4289eng
dc.identifier.issn1944-9194en_US
dc.identifier.issn0278-7407en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1956/22070
dc.description.abstractViscous crustal flow can exhume once deeply buried rocks in postorogenic metamorphic core complexes (MCCs). While migmatite domes record the flow dynamics of anatectic crust, the mechanics and kinematics of solid‐state flow in the deep crust are poorly constrained. To address this issue, we studied a deeply eroded and particularly well‐exposed MCC in the southern Western Gneiss Region of Norway. The Gulen MCC formed during Devonian transtensional collapse of the Caledonian orogeny in the footwall of the Nordfjord‐Sogn detachment zone. We developed a semiquantitative mapping scheme for ductile strain to constrain micro‐ to megascale processes, which brought eclogite‐bearing crust from the orogenic root into direct contact with Devonian supradetachment basins. The Gulen MCC comprises different structural levels with distinct metamorphic evolutions. In the high‐grade core, amphibolite‐facies structures record fluid‐controlled eclogite retrogression and coaxial flow involving vast extension‐perpendicular shortening. Detachment mylonites formed during ductile‐to‐brittle noncoaxial deformation and wrap around the core. We present a sequential 3‐D reconstruction of MCC formation. In the detachment zone, the combined effects of simple shearing, incision/excision, and erosion thinned the upper crust. Internal necking of the ductile crust was compensated by extension‐perpendicular shortening within the deep crust and resulted in differential folding of distinct crustal levels. We identify this differential folding as the main mechanism that can redistribute material within solid‐state MCCs. Our interpretation suggests a continuum of processes from migmatite‐cored to solid‐state MCCs and has implications for postorogenic exhumation of (ultra‐)high‐pressure rocks.en_US
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherAmerican Geophysical Unionen_US
dc.rightsAttribution CC BYeng
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/eng
dc.titleDeep Crustal Flow Within Postorogenic Metamorphic Core Complexes: Insights From the Southern Western Gneiss Region of Norwayen_US
dc.typePeer reviewed
dc.typeJournal article
dc.date.updated2020-01-30T14:42:02Z
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2019 The Authorsen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1029/2019tc005708
dc.identifier.cristin1779154
dc.source.journalTectonics


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution CC BY
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution CC BY