| dc.contributor.author | Antonsen, Pål Fjeldvig | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2020-05-05T10:42:03Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2020-05-05T10:42:03Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2018 | |
| dc.Published | Antonsen P. Scorekeeping. Analysis. 2018;78(4):589-595 | eng |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0003-2638 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1467-8284 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1956/22094 | |
| dc.description.abstract | An influential suggestion from David Lewis is that we should think of assertions in terms of how they affect the conversational score. This note outlines a way to model conversational scores in such a way that two assertoric effects are brought together: that to assert is to propose to add information to the common ground, and that to assert is to undertake commitments. Rather than being seen as rivals, they should be viewed as complementary descriptions of our practises of making assertions. | en_US |
| dc.language.iso | eng | eng |
| dc.publisher | Oxford University Press | eng |
| dc.title | Scorekeeping | eng |
| dc.type | Peer reviewed | |
| dc.type | Journal article | |
| dc.date.updated | 2019-12-09T08:19:12Z | |
| dc.description.version | acceptedVersion | |
| dc.rights.holder | Copyright 2018 The Author(s). All rights reserved | eng |
| dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/anx145 | |
| dc.identifier.cristin | 1557184 | |
| dc.source.journal | Analysis | |
| dc.relation.project | Norges forskningsråd: 251218 | |
