Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorNilsen, Bo Wolden_US
dc.contributor.authorJensen, Einaren_US
dc.contributor.authorÖrtengren, Ulfen_US
dc.contributor.authorBang, Beriten_US
dc.contributor.authorMichelsen, Vibeke Barmanen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-05-13T09:05:05Z
dc.date.available2020-05-13T09:05:05Z
dc.date.issued2019-10
dc.PublishedNilsen B, Jensen e, Örtengren U, Bang BE, Michelsen VB. Airborne exposure to gaseous and particle-associated organic substances in resin-based dental materials during restorative procedures. European Journal of Oral Sciences. 2019;127(5):425-434eng
dc.identifier.issn0909-8836
dc.identifier.issn1600-0722
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1956/22218
dc.description.abstractDental composite dust has been shown to act as a vehicle for methacrylates in vivo/in vitro. The objective of this study was to assess airborne exposure of dental personnel to gaseous and particle‐associated organic constituents from resin‐based dental materials in a simulated clinic. Sampling of total aerosol fractions and gaseous substances was performed by dental students carrying particle filters and gas sorbents attached to a personal pump during preclinical restorative procedures in phantom models (n = 13). Water from the phantoms was sampled. Organic substances were extracted from the sampled water, particle filters, and gas sorbents. Qualitative and quantitative analyses were performed by gas chromatography‐mass spectrometry (GC‐MS) and ultra‐high‐performance liquid chromatography‐mass spectrometry (UHPLC‐MS). The methacrylates 2‐hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA) and triethylene glycol dimethacrylate (TEGDMA) and the additives camphorquinone (CQ), butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT), and ethyl 4‐(dimethylamino)benzoate (DMABEE), were quantified in the gas and particle fractions sampled. A positive‐control experiment was conducted. No methacrylates were detected in the gas or particle fractions sampled, whereas strong signals for methacrylates were detected in the positive controls, matching the analysis of the uncured material. In addition, TEGDMA and DMABEE were quantified in the sampled water. Airborne exposure to constituents in resin‐based dental materials was below the detection limit. However, the extent of exposure is probably dependent on the procedure, preventive measures, and type of materials used.en_US
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherWileyeng
dc.rightsAttribution CC BYeng
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/eng
dc.subjectair pollutantseng
dc.subjectdentistryeng
dc.subjectmethacrylateseng
dc.subjectoccupationaleng
dc.subjectoperativeeng
dc.subjectparticulate mattereng
dc.titleAirborne exposure to gaseous and particle-associated organic substances in resin-based dental materials during restorative proceduresen_US
dc.typePeer reviewed
dc.typeJournal article
dc.date.updated2019-12-09T14:31:26Z
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2019 The Author(s)
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1111/eos.12646
dc.identifier.cristin1720805
dc.source.journalEuropean Journal of Oral Sciences


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution CC BY
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution CC BY