Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKayser, Jurgen
dc.contributor.authorWong, Lidia Y X
dc.contributor.authorSacchi, Elizabeth
dc.contributor.authorCasal-Roscum, Lindsey
dc.contributor.authorAlvarenga, Jorge E
dc.contributor.authorHugdahl, Kenneth
dc.contributor.authorBruder, Gerard E
dc.contributor.authorJonides, John
dc.PublishedKayser, Wong, Sacchi, Casal-Roscum, Alvarenga, Hugdahl K, Bruder, Jonides. Behavioral measures of attention and cognitive control during a new auditory working memory paradigm. Behavior Research Methods. 2019eng
dc.description.abstractProactive control is the ability to manipulate and maintain goal-relevant information within working memory (WM), allowing individuals to selectively attend to important information while inhibiting irrelevant distractions. Deficits in proactive control may cause multiple cognitive impairments seen in schizophrenia. However, studies of cognitive control have largely relied on visual tasks, even though the functional deficits in schizophrenia are more frequent and severe in the auditory domain (i.e., hallucinations). Hence, we developed an auditory analogue of a visual ignore/suppress paradigm. Healthy adults (N = 40) listened to a series of four letters (600-ms stimulus onset asynchrony) presented alternately to each ear, followed by a 3.2-s maintenance interval and a probe. Participants were directed either to selectively ignore (I) the to-be-presented letters at one ear, to suppress (S) letters already presented to one ear, or to remember (R) all presented letters. The critical cue was provided either before (I) or after (S) the encoding series, or simultaneously with the probe (R). The probes were encoding items presented to either the attended/not suppressed ear (“valid”) or the ignored/suppressed ear (“lure”), or were not presented (“control”). Replicating prior findings during visual ignore/suppress tasks, response sensitivity and latency revealed poorer performance for lure than for control trials, particularly during the suppress condition. Shorter suppress than remember latencies suggested a behavioral advantage when discarding encoded items from WM. The paradigm-related internal consistencies and 1-week test–retest reliabilities (n = 38) were good to excellent. Our findings validate these auditory WM tasks as a reliable manipulation of proactive control and set the stage for studies with schizophrenia patients who experience auditory hallucinations.en_US
dc.publisherSpringer Natureeng
dc.rightsAttribution CC BYeng
dc.subjectAuditory modalityeng
dc.subjectProactive controleng
dc.subjectTest–retest reliabilityeng
dc.subjectWorking memoryeng
dc.titleBehavioral measures of attention and cognitive control during a new auditory working memory paradigmeng
dc.typePeer reviewed
dc.typeJournal article
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2019 The Author(s)eng
dc.source.journalBehavior Research Methods

Files in this item


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution CC BY
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution CC BY