Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorBukve, Toneen_US
dc.contributor.authorSandberg, Sverreen_US
dc.contributor.authorVie, Wenche S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSølvik, Una Ørvimen_US
dc.contributor.authorChristensen, Nina Gadeen_US
dc.contributor.authorStavelin, Anneen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-23T11:37:34Z
dc.date.available2020-06-23T11:37:34Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.PublishedBukve T, Sandberg S, Vie WS, Sølvik UØ, Christensen NG, Stavelin A. Commutability of a whole-blood external quality assessment material for point-of-care C-reactive protein, glucose, and hemoglobin testing. Clinical Chemistry. 2019;65(6):791-797eng
dc.identifier.issn0009-9147
dc.identifier.issn1530-8561
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1956/22830
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: The optimal situation in external quality assessment (EQA) is to use commutable materials. No previous study has examined the commutability of a whole-blood material for point-of-care (POC) testing. The aim of this study was to determine the commutability of the Norwegian Quality Improvement of Laboratory Examinations (Noklus) organization's “in-house” whole-blood EQA material for C-reactive protein (CRP), glucose, and hemoglobin for frequently used POC instruments in Norway and to determine the possibility of using a common target value for each analyte. METHODS: The study was performed according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines. The EQA material was pooled stabilized EDTA venous whole-blood containing different concentrations of the analytes. The EQA material and native routine patient samples were analyzed using 17 POC and 3 hospital instruments. The commutability was assessed using Deming regression analysis with 95% prediction intervals for each instrument comparison. RESULTS: The EQA material was commutable for all CRP and hemoglobin POC instruments, whereas for glucose the material was commutable for all POC instruments at the lowest concentration analyzed [126.0 mg/dL (7.0 mmol/L)] and for 3 POC instruments at all of the concentrations analyzed. CONCLUSIONS: Noklus EQA participants using CRP and hemoglobin POC instruments now receive results that are compared with a reference target value, whereas the results for participants using glucose POC instruments are still compared with method-specific target values. Systematic deviations from a reference target value for the commutable glucose POC instruments can be calculated, and this additional information can now be offered to these participants and to the manufacturers.en_US
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherOxford University Presseng
dc.titleCommutability of a whole-blood external quality assessment material for point-of-care C-reactive protein, glucose, and hemoglobin testingen_US
dc.typePeer reviewed
dc.typeJournal article
dc.date.updated2020-01-15T12:02:31Z
dc.description.versionacceptedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2019 The American Association for Clinical Chemistry
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2018.300202
dc.identifier.cristin1714786
dc.source.journalClinical Chemistry


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel